XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: tnp@invalid.invalid   
      
   On 21/12/2025 05:00, rbowman wrote:   
   > On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 02:09:17 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:   
   >   
   >> Which is the *least* profitable? Obviously it’s 2). Something to think   
   >> about the next time somebody tries to convince you of some kind of   
   >> “vaccine conspiracy” ...   
   >   
   > The vaccine business certainly didn't hurt Pfizer's bottom line. The   
   > patents on their three cash cows, Viagra, Zoloft, and Lipitor had expired,   
   > the last, Viagra, in 2020. Their Alzheimer's drug was a dry hole and they   
   > folded the research department.   
   >   
   > As for Lipitor, the fascination with statins lines more pockets than   
   > Pfizer's. My doctor is a bit of a cynic and says the checklist she has to   
   > use for Medicare somehow always comes out 'you need statins'.   
      
   Yes. I couldn't tolerate them and I do actually need them. I am on   
   something VeryExpensivet™ now that actually works with no side effects,   
   except I haven't had another blocked heart artery since I started on them...   
      
   Again its all about genetics, lifestyle and diet.   
   We have all loved longer than our grandparents because of modern drugs   
   and despite modern diets   
      
   --   
   Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows investigation will lead   
   to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)