Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.misc    |    Linux-specific topics not covered by oth    |    135,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 133,930 of 135,536    |
|    rbowman to Lars Poulsen    |
|    Re: Lubuntu vs. Xubuntu: Which Ubuntu fl    |
|    27 Dec 25 03:56:18    |
      From: bowman@montana.com              On Fri, 26 Dec 2025 20:49:28 -0000 (UTC), Lars Poulsen wrote:              > The BIG differences between distributions are - initd vs systemd - RPM       > vs apt              Well, sort of. There are .deb and .rpm packages. The Apt Package Tool       uses .deb packages. Most Debian derived distros I'm familiar with use       apt.              There is a RPM Package manager that uses .rpm files (surprise), but there       are frontends for it too. Fedora did use yum but now uses dnf. /usr/bin/       yum is a symlink to dnf. OpenSUSE has zypper and a couple of other .rpm       based distros have their own package managers.              Then there is Arch Linux and pacman. That's the odd one. Rather than dnf       update or apt update is pacman -Syu, with a similar syntax for installs.       There are ways, not recommended, to use .deb or .rpm packages in Arch. I'm       not that brave. Then there is the yay frontend to the Arch User Repository       (AUR) that's more like automating building a tarball.              There's probably other schemes given the 100+ distros.              You also missed the other big food fight, Wayland vs. x11.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca