Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.misc    |    Linux-specific topics not covered by oth    |    135,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 133,932 of 135,536    |
|    rbowman to Computer Nerd Kev    |
|    Re: The Web (HTML) Sux    |
|    27 Dec 25 04:05:56    |
      From: bowman@montana.com              On 27 Dec 2025 08:29:46 +1000, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:              > That's fine, you want to write an application in a web browser, you can       > do that. I won't use it because I think it's a wasteful and fragile       > approach, but I'll find/write a native program instead.              Real world scenario: The legacy system consisted of several Motif based       GUIs, plus many backend daemons. For updates or bug fixes the GUIs have to       be copied to several workstations in the dispatch center.              It doesn't end there. In today's world every police car, fire engine, and       ambulance has a laptop running applications. For bug fixes or updates with       native programs you have to cycle each of those laptops through the shop,       potentially a couple of hundred updates.              Enter the web app. It runs in the browser, and is distributed from a       central server. Update or make a bug fix on the server, all the client       apps are automatically updated.              Which is more resource intensive, has the most downtime, and has the       potential for outdated native programs?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca