Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.misc    |    Linux-specific topics not covered by oth    |    135,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,136 of 135,536    |
|    The Natural Philosopher to All    |
|    Re: naughty Python    |
|    31 Dec 25 12:39:31    |
      XPost: alt.folklore.computers       From: tnp@invalid.invalid              On 31/12/2025 04:42, c186282 wrote:       > According to Penrose, you need a quantum system - with       > its random mistakes - to emulate a brain. Kind of doubt       > that, but now we ARE seeing quantum computing so I       > guess we'll see.              Don't get me going about Penrose.              Back in the day we used to plat the game 'think of a number'              Then get the recipient to perform various mathematical operations on it,       into which at a discrete point was slipped the instruction 'now take       away the number you first thought of' followed by more spurious BS until       you could tell them what the answer was you had arrived at ...'but how       did you know what number I first thought of'. I didn't. the point was to       cloak a simple trick in pages of tough mental arithmetic...so people       concentrated on that, and missed the trick.              Penrose is a great mathematician, but his metaphysics sucks. He has       never been able to escape from the classical worldview, even though his       research shows him that it is insufficient.              "I cant explain consciousness in terms of classical reality, ergo it is       quantum"              A whole fucking book...                     I *can* explain classical reality in terms of consciousness. *And* the       quantum field. But not when consciousness is an emergent property of       said quantum field. You end up with recursion and paradox.              The only schema that works is to place consciousness in an orthogonal       dimension to both quantum reality AND the 'classical' reality.              The picture on the screen is a function of the hardware and that data       AND the software, that is running.              Is the software a different thing to the hardware?              Semantics.              --       “Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.”              H.L. Mencken, A Mencken Chrestomathy              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca