Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.misc    |    Linux-specific topics not covered by oth    |    135,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,226 of 135,536    |
|    Carlos E.R. to All    |
|    Re: naughty Python    |
|    02 Jan 26 12:24:26    |
      XPost: alt.folklore.computers       From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 2026-01-02 11:37, c186282 wrote:       > On 1/2/26 00:59, rbowman wrote:       >> On Thu, 1 Jan 2026 23:54:37 -0000 (UTC), Waldek Hebisch wrote:       >>       >>> IMO biggest drawback of Turbo Pascal was poor speed of generated code       >>> (and size too). For me deal breaker was fact that Turbo Pascal was       >>> 16-bit and tied to DOS. DJGCC gave me 32-bit integers and slightly       >>> later I switched to Linux, so Turbo Pascal was not longer relevant for       >>> me. But if you were programming 16-bit DOS and did not mind poor speed       >>> of generated code, than IMO Turbo Pascal was quite decent programming       >>> language, quite competitive in expressivity to C.       >>       >> I never used the DOS TurboPascal, only the CP/M version. I used the BDS C       >> subset compiler on CP/M and moved to DJGPP eventually.       >       > Look ... consider the existing environment. It WAS       > the M$/IBM multi-pass Pascal compiler (still have       > that in a VM and DO use it once in awhile for fun).       >       > TP was a TOTAL REVOLUTION ... not only because of       > the integrated development environment but because       > of the BLAZING compilation speed.       >       > If/when the final code was a bit bigger than the       > old compilers - WHO CARED ???              I don't remember at what version, 4 or 6, the binary program became much       smaller. A HelloWorld was roughly 2 KB, while in C it was 28. They       invented smart linking.                     >       > TP let you write, test, re-write, test ... in       > mere MINUTES and helped you along all the way.       >       > In short it SET THE STANDARD for how IDEs       > should be. From there on everybody expected       > equal or better.       >       > And yes, I love Pascal ... still use FPC/Lazarus       > quite a bit. There's just a certain 'elegance'       > to Pascal ... reminds of composing classical       > music somehow ........       >                     --       Cheers, Carlos.       ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca