Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.misc    |    Linux-specific topics not covered by oth    |    135,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,365 of 135,536    |
|    rbowman to All    |
|    Re: Naughty =?UTF-8?B?Q+KZrw==?=    |
|    05 Jan 26 03:55:00    |
      XPost: alt.folklore.computers       From: bowman@montana.com              On Sun, 4 Jan 2026 19:04:14 -0500, c186282 wrote:              > On 1/4/26 16:18, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >> On Sun, 04 Jan 2026 19:41:11 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:       >>       >>> Does C# qualify as a Microsoft proprietary language? Or are there       >>> implementations on OSes other than Windows (and compilers, either open       >>> source or available from other vendors)?       >>       >> The only implementation I’m aware of is Microsoft’s one built on top of       >> Dotnet.       >>       >> Dotnet itself is supposedly open-source and portable to some degree       >> now. There are reports of it running on Linux.       >       > That would be very end-around ...       >       > Maybe just to forget C# ... CPP is good enough.       >       > Actually, don't even like CPP ... plain 'C' has so far met all my       > needs.              I was thinking about C++ on my walk today. Arduino sketches and other MCU       SDKs refer to C/C++.              #include |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca