Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.misc    |    Linux-specific topics not covered by oth    |    135,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,379 of 135,536    |
|    Carlos E.R. to Chris Ahlstrom    |
|    Re: C structure portability, naughty Pyt    |
|    05 Jan 26 13:25:51    |
      XPost: alt.folklore.computers       From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 2026-01-04 15:43, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:       > Carlos E.R. wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:       >       >> On 2026-01-03 20:43, rbowman wrote:       >>> On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 07:03:38 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:       >>>       >>>> I once created an audio playback app with class hierarchies in C, rather       >>>> than C++. It was an interesting experiment, and it worked. But that's       >>>> the last time I tried that.       >>>       >>> A class is a glorified struct. I remember heated discussions at one of the       >>> Boston Computer Society's meeting before 'C++' became a name about 'C with       >>> Classes' and whether a new language was needed.       >>>       >>> 'C with Classes' is now a derogatory term that describes the sort of C++ I       >>> write. Charles Petzhold has written a number of books on programming for       >>> Windows. He has an intense dislike for C++ so if you can track down some       >>> of the first editions of 'Programming Windows' they are all C. The 6th       >>> edition was C# which he said was what should have been all along.       >>       >> What's the difference between C++ and C#? (I don't know how to pronounce       >> that one).       >       > C-sharp. (Get it? Get it?)              Mmm... no, I don't think I get it. Maybe something cultural in it.              >       > AI Overview       >       > C++ and C# are both derived from the C language family but       > target different programming needs:       >       > C++ offers high performance and low-level hardware control,       > making it ideal for systems programming and game engines,       > while C# provides a managed, higher-level environment for       > easier and faster development of web, desktop, and mobile       > applications       >       > Kind of analogous to C++ versus Java.       >       > I don't really agree that C# is easier. You still have to develop       > a mental model of the language and master adjunct frameworks like       > .NET.       >              Ok :-)              --       Cheers, Carlos.       ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca