Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.misc    |    Linux-specific topics not covered by oth    |    135,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,451 of 135,536    |
|    rbowman to Chris Ahlstrom    |
|    Re: naughty Pascal    |
|    06 Jan 26 19:20:55    |
      XPost: alt.folklore.computers       From: bowman@montana.com              On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 06:33:22 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:              > The Natural Philosopher wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:       >       >> On 06/01/2026 03:37, Peter Flass wrote:       >>>>       >>>> And I still write in Pascal fairly often - like it better than       >>>> 'C'.       >>>       >>> I'm not sure to what extent there was an attempt early on to       >>> standardize the extensions, but this would have helped adoption of the       >>> language immensely.       >>       >> AFAIAC Pascal was C in a straitjacket with all the handy bits removed.       >>       >> I saw no reason to ever use it in preference.       >       > I remember at work recommending Borland C++, which I really liked based       > on Turbo C++ (IIRC).       >       > Imagine my dismay when seeing weird behavior in the debugger and then       > finding out that the VCL framework was... Delphi (Object Pascal).              I preferred OWL to MFC but the 500# gorilla won.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca