Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.misc    |    Linux-specific topics not covered by oth    |    135,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,530 of 135,536    |
|    Peter Flass to All    |
|    Re: naughty Pascal    |
|    08 Jan 26 07:47:08    |
      XPost: alt.folklore.computers       From: Peter@Iron-Spring.com              On 1/7/26 19:26, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       > On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 19:21:09 -0700, Peter Flass wrote:       >       >> FORTRAN and COBOL are still around, but I don't thinks anyone from       >> the 70s would recognize them.       >       > COBOL is still COBOL. Fortran has evolved somewhat, post-Fortran-77.              Looking at the Wikipedia article, it sounds like there have been major       enhancements to COBOL since COBOL-60. I don't think modern FORTRAN is       close to the original language either. I haven't followed either       language enough in the last decades to be specific.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca