home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.os.linux.misc      Linux-specific topics not covered by oth      135,536 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 134,883 of 135,536   
   The Natural Philosopher to Richard Kettlewell   
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=E2=80=9C7_deprecated_Li   
   17 Jan 26 18:20:35   
   
   From: tnp@invalid.invalid   
      
   On 17/01/2026 13:11, Richard Kettlewell wrote:   
   > "Carlos E.R."  writes:   
   >> On 2026-01-16 15:57, The Natural Philosopher wrote:   
   >>> On 16/01/2026 12:48, Carlos E.R. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> scp -- wrong. rsync, scp and sftp are all different ways of   
   >>>> transferring files securely over SSH.   
   >>> Are they? even if you run  rsyncd?   
   >   
   > If you tell it to connect to an rsyncd then indeed it does not use SSH.   
   >   
   > Personally I have never bothered with rsyncd...   
   >   
   Ah. I do. None of my data is private that is being stored remotely   
      
   >> AFAIK yes, the transfer happens of the ssh port with ssh type of   
   >> encryption. That is what the article says, so take it with a pinch of   
   >> salt. Variances per distributions. It is true in openSUSE.   
   >   
   > The zdnet article says nothing about what protocol rsync uses.   
   >   
   I think it is straight streaming of bytes and that is it.   
   Locally i have nfs mounts to move data around.   
      
   So I don't really use ssh protocols to copy data at all.   
      
      
   --   
   There’s a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons   
   that sound good.   
      
   Burton Hillis (William Vaughn, American columnist)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca