Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.misc    |    Linux-specific topics not covered by oth    |    135,536 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,916 of 135,536    |
|    Nuno Silva to All    |
|    Re: ever had 1GB+ kern.log (and syslog)     |
|    19 Jan 26 09:42:55    |
      From: nunojsilva@invalid.invalid              On 2026-01-19, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:              > On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 23:04:33 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >       >> On 2026-01-18 22:04, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>>       >>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 12:50:13 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>>       >>>> By the way, syslog doesn't get all the boot messages.       >>>       >>> That’s one of the goals of systemd, to be able to capture messages       >>> from as early as possible.       >>       >> Syslog, before systemd intervened, managed to capture all messages       >> just fine.       >       > It was never able to capture the dmesg stuff, as far as I know.              I don't even know if this is describing something that's systemd under       the hood or if it is syslog, but [1].              Also [2] (requires JavaScript to read what ought to be static       content...) for syslog-ng.              [1] https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_       inux/8/html/managing_monitoring_and_updating_the_kernel/getting-       tarted-with-kernel-logging_managing-monitoring-and-updating-the-kernel              [2] https://github.com/syslog-ng/syslog-ng/issues/1360                     --       Nuno Silva              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca