XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: not-zeke@the-zeke.com
"XX" wrote in message
news:853Vn.2399$RC5.994@newsfe08.iad...
>
> "Ezekiel" wrote in message
> news:i01138$g8q$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>>
>> "XX" wrote in message
>> news:qDTUn.406$sR2.91@newsfe24.iad...
>>>
>>> "Justin" wrote in message
>>> news:i00rej$aci$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> On 06/24/2010 05:03 PM, XX wrote:
>>>>> "Justin" wrote in message
>>>>> news:i00ge6$gaa$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> On 06/24/2010 04:41 PM, XX wrote:
>>>>>>> "Justin" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:i00f8p$svd$4@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>> On 06/24/2010 04:14 PM, XX wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Justin" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:i00chc$865$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>> Here is yet another failure for Windows 7.
>>>>>>>>>> Here's the Readers' Digest version of whats going on. The Win7
>>>>>>>>>> drivers
>>>>>>>>>> aren't fully compatible with the Wireless 802.11. So it works
>>>>>>>>>> fine
>>>>>>>>>> without any encryption but the instant I secure the network -
>>>>>>>>>> "Windows
>>>>>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>>>>> was unable to connect to the network."
>>>>>>>>>> I installed Ubuntu on the machine - worked like a champ - WPA2
>>>>>>>>>> personal
>>>>>>>>>> and all.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, how about if one of you Microsoft trolls explain how this is
>>>>>>>>>> actually a design feature or is somehow my fault. Remember I
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> 10+
>>>>>>>>>> years of IT experience I know how to solve driver problems.
>>>>>>>>>> The fact that there are no Win 7 drivers for this wireless
>>>>>>>>>> adapter
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> all Microsoft's fault. I guess Microsoft just doesn't have the
>>>>>>>>>> resources or brainpower to fix this little problem.
>>>>>>>>>> Oh well.
>>>>>>>>>> The laptop is my brother's. He told me to spec out a new laptop
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> him. A Macbook Pro.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Ten years experience" and what you learned in the first month is
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> far
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> you progressed!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now that reply was pure genius.
>>>>>>>> Half an hour response time? You're slipping, kiddo!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was reading stuff from the better trolls and posting there first
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> working on my own material first. You shouldn't flatter yourself,
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> close to last on my reading agenda. A "bottom of the barrel" thing.
>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>> keep the faith; there are some Freaks here whose material I don't
>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>> bother opening.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trolls?
>>>>>> I was simply stating that Linux does something Windows can't. You
>>>>>> see
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> was "advocating" an OS in an advocacy group. Which leads me to
>>>>>> believe
>>>>>> you don't actually know what a troll is. Get off your parents'
>>>>>> Optiplex
>>>>>> and buy a convertible - its Summer!
>>>>>> I'm looking at a 35th anniversary Z28 convertible. I doubt I'll buy
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> though.
>>>>>
>>>>> I drive a Ferrari, son. You couldn't afford to buy one of its wheels.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HAHA!
>>>> Does anyone take you seriously?
>>>
>>> I'll remember your remark next time I drive it.
>>
>> So Moccasin Joe - you phoney. Why don't you post a picture of it along
>> with a sign inside the car with a message so we know that it's really
>> your
>> car.
>
> Why would I waste my time doing that? I have no need to prove anything to
> a
> nothing like you. Does MJ drive a Ferrari also?
If you don't need to prove anything then why do you go out of your way to
try and impress people with your stupid claims Moccasin Joe or whatever BS
nym you're using this week? You evidently have *unlimited* time to waste
trying to impress people with your BS so why not prove everyone wrong.
(Like anyone is stupid enough not to know why you run away like a scared
little girl.)
>> Fact is that you're some broke turd who lives in a trailer park. The
>> closest you'll ever come to a Ferrari is if you happen to see one on your
>> way to work at the bowling alley.
>
> Is that a fact?
Yes. Certainly closer to reality than your Ferrari, mansion and boat.
> Look at it this way; if I did live in a trailer park, and I
> did work in a bowling alley, I would still have a much larger revenue
> stream than you,
Yawn... talk is cheap. And that's all you can afford is talk.
> and my dog Mugsy would still be eating better than you. But if your
> fantasy comforts you, stick with it. It's really all you got.
>
>> So where' the picture that proves you own one?
>
> Asked and answered.
So the answer is that you don't own shit and that's why you're unable to
post any picutres. It is certainly answered.
After all, a photo of your 1983 Chrysler K-car isn't going to impress
anyone. Your bullshit talking doesn't impress anyone either. Of course you
know that... you're just out for a (s)troll. Trying to get that attention
that your two dads never gave you when you were a child.
>> Like anyone's surprised that you're a pathetic wannabe liar.
>
> Again - what you think doesn't matter - unless you can contribute to my
> income. But a stumblebum like you can't even contribute to your own .
I'll contribute to your income by dropping a quarter in the tin-cup of some
subway hobo.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
