t-delegated.example.com> 4cd3be3f   
   XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: dosexes@dsahiuargd.net   
      
   "Justin" wrote in message   
   news:justin-33A83D.16351425062010@reserved-multicast-range-not-d   
   legated.example.com...   
   > In article ,   
   > "XX" wrote:   
   >   
   >> "Justin" wrote in message   
   >> news:i02m97$1nj$7@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >> > On 06/25/2010 11:47 AM, XX wrote:   
   >> >> "MuahMan" wrote in message   
   >> >> news:be18729b-05f0-4569-9d3f-62e2aab17266@c33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...   
   >> >> On Jun 24, 10:51 pm, Justin wrote:   
   >> >>> On 06/24/2010 09:31 PM, XX wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>> "Justin" wrote in message   
   >> >>>> news:i00pjr$s5g$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >> >>>>> On 06/24/2010 06:38 PM, Rotten Apple wrote:   
   >> >>>>>> "ray" wrote in message   
   >> >>>>>> news:88i1ulF8dtU8@mid.individual.net...   
   >> >>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 23:10:31 +0200, Hadron wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>>>>> ray writes:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:43:39 -0400, Justin wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> Here is yet another failure for Windows 7. Here's the Readers'   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> Digest   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> version of whats going on. The Win7 drivers aren't fully   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> compatible   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> with the Wireless 802.11. So it works fine without any   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> encryption   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> but   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> the instant I secure the network - "Windows 7 was unable to   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> connect   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> to   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> the network." I installed Ubuntu on the machine - worked like   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> a   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> champ   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> - WPA2 personal and all.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> So, how about if one of you Microsoft trolls explain how this   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> is   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> actually a design feature or is somehow my fault. Remember I   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> have   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> 10+   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> years of IT experience I know how to solve driver problems.   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> The   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> fact   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> that there are no Win 7 drivers for this wireless adapter is   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> all   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> Microsoft's fault. I guess Microsoft just doesn't have the   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> resources   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> or brainpower to fix this little problem. Oh well. The laptop   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> is   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> my   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> brother's. He told me to spec out a new laptop for him. A   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> Macbook   
   >> >>>>>>>>>> Pro.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>>>>>> That would be yet another example of MS planned obsolescence.   
   >> >>>>>>>>> They'd   
   >> >>>>>>>>> rather have you get your win7 up on a new computer - they are   
   >> >>>>>>>>> hardly   
   >> >>>>>>>>> interested in backwards compatibility.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>>>>> What happened to it all being the maker of the HW in question's   
   >> >>>>>>>> fault.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>>>>> You know and I know Raytard that that story is a crock of shit.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>>>> One can ask whose 'fault' it is. Obviously MS does not develop   
   >> >>>>>>> drivers   
   >> >>>>>>> for anything they leave it to the manufacturer - so from that   
   >> >>>>>>> point   
   >> >>>>>>> of   
   >> >>>>>>> view, it is the manufacturers fault. One can also ask if MS   
   >> >>>>>>> SHOULD   
   >> >>>>>>> supply   
   >> >>>>>>> drivers - in which case it is their fault. And obviously, MS   
   >> >>>>>>> could   
   >> >>>>>>> provide 'hooks' to enable older drivers - but they have no   
   >> >>>>>>> interest   
   >> >>>>>>> in   
   >> >>>>>>> backwards compatibility.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>>> Why aren't you wondering why no manufacturer or model number has   
   >> >>>>>> been   
   >> >>>>>> named   
   >> >>>>>> in spite of the questions being asked several times?   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>> C120x - see previous post, kiddo.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>> Now that was a long Google search. A long waste of time.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> That makes alot of sense.   
   >> >>> The fact is, Linux was working trouble free on the same machine   
   >> >>> Windows   
   >> >>> simply couldn't cut it.   
   >> >>> Therefore Windows 7 is flawed.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Even Windows isn't retard proof.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Don't take this the wrong way; I don't mean it as an isult... but you   
   >> >> appear to be mentally challenged or possibly severely retarded.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> I pity you.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> No! He's free entertainment. He charged in like a bull, and after we   
   >> >> fuck   
   >> >> him around he'll quietly tip toe away like a pussycat.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>   
   >> >   
   >> > You have a cat fetish, kiddo.   
   >> > I hate to imagine your upbringing.   
   >> > You see, kids - this guy is what happens with the breakdown of the   
   >> > traditional family.   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> I see you failed your psychology class also. Another failure in a long   
   >> line.   
   >>   
   >> Speaking of families and failures, are you the biggest failure in yours?   
   >>   
   >> What are you doing here this time of day, did your employer lay you off?   
   >> They always chop the dead wood first.   
   >>   
   >> And to answer your question: I'm recouping from a few days of playing in   
   >> the Bahamas on my boat. Do you have a boat? A widdle boat that you play   
   >> with in the tub?   
   >   
   > You're recouping from ogling teenagers at your local public swimming   
   > pool - whoa re you kidding?   
   > Ferrari.   
   > Boat.   
   > Bahamas.   
   > A true testament to your supposed success - trolling the newsgroups.   
   >   
   > There's an old saying - those who can, do.   
   > Those who can't, brag.   
   > However you can do neither so you come here.   
      
      
   Yaaawwwwnnnnnn.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|