XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand   
      
   In message , Hadron wrote:   
      
   > Lawrence D'Oliveiro  writes:   
   >   
   >> In message , Hadron wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro  writes:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Why risk running [encryption] on a system that cannot be guaranteed to   
   >>>> be free of back doors?   
   >>>   
   >>> Surely thats WHERE you want encryption...   
   >>   
   >> Not a good idea. Because encryption poorly implemented (e.g. on the wrong   
   >> side of an insecure trust boundary, as you’re proposing) is worse than no   
   >> encryption at all. Because it leads people into believing it’s worth   
   >> something, when it’s not.   
   >   
   > Aha more word games.   
   >   
   > So lets dig beneath all that waffle : you are effectively saying   
   > encryption is worthless.   
      
   Where did I say that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)