XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: jedi@nomad.mishnet
On 2012-12-12, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> On 2012-12-12, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2012-12-12, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
>>>>> GreyCloud wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't know. But X11 is getting long in the tooth.
>>>>>
>>>>> A replacement has been in the works for a while, and some people feel
>>>>> that it is getting mature enough to think about transitioning over to
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If it can't handle natively running applications over the network at
>>>> least
>>>> as well as RDP or X11 itself then it's a total nonstarter.
>>>
>>> Luckily Wayland is designed to be able to do that.
>>
>> No it isn't.
>
> You are wrong. It *can* do remote X, that is just a plugin away
Remote X on top of Wayland is much like doing X on top of Wnidows.
It's not the same thing at all.
>
>> Wayland developers and fanboys treat remote desktops as a passe
>> feature that should be left back in the 80s despite the realities
>> of modern corporate desktop computing.
>>
>> Remote access isn't being addressed. It's being ignored.
>
> Nope. Wrong on all accounts
>
You are conflating something like Hummingbird with real baked
in remote access features that are considered and designed into the
project while it is being built.
That proves my point.
--
Negligence will never equal intent, no matter how you
attempt to distort reality to do so. This is what separates |||
the real butchers from average Joes (or Fritzes) caught up in / | \
events not in their control.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
