home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy      Putting Bill Gates on a giant pedestal      5,647 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,596 of 5,647   
   Justin to Justin   
   Re: Showdown! exFAT vs UDF 2.01   
   19 Nov 15 21:39:37   
   
   XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: justin@nobecauseihatespam.edu   
      
   On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:33:34 -0500   
   Justin  wrote:   
      
   > 50 GB file - the ZIM file form wikipedia.   
   >   
   > I used UDF 2.01 for compatibility.   
   > I used a 64GB USB 3 drive, Corsair Voyager Vega, on my Late 2013 15"   
   > MacBook Pro. The transfer took just over and under 50 minutes.  I did   
   > the UDF test while I was at work, and doing all sorts of other work   
   > related crap, so the transfer was probably slower than it should have   
   > been.  I will run the test again. After each test I zeroed out the   
   > first meg or two of the drive (dd if=/dev/zero...) and reformatted   
   > using newfs_udf and newfs_exfat respectively. UDF was 512B allocation   
   > unit (cluster) size while the exFAT was 13,1072B.  This was a   
   > mistake, I wanted both to be 512.  The larger cluster size on exFAT   
   > is probably responsible for the lower time.   
   >   
   > MD5 (Downloads/wikipedia_en_all_2015-05.zim) =   
   > 2dabe5cf628a54f6edc97ac77b7c7c52 50,900,153,262B Jun 17 21:02   
   > wikipedia_en_all_2015-05.zim   
   >   
   > UDF:   
   > $ time cp wikipedia_en_all_2015-05.zim /Volumes/Corsair64GB/   
   > wikipedia_en_all_2015-05.zim   
   > -> /Volumes/Corsair64GB/wikipedia_en_all_2015-05.zim real   
   > 53m11.412s user	0m0.084s   
   > sys	0m46.543s   
   > 50,900MB/3,191s = 15.9MB/s   
   >   
   > exFAT:   
   > $ time cp wikipedia_en_all_2015-05.zim /Volumes/Corsair64GB/   
   > real	47m38.782s   
   > user	0m0.129s   
   > sys	0m51.018s   
   > 50,900MB/2,858s = 17.80MB/s   
   >   
   >   
   > So, it would seem UDF 2.01 is a more viable option than exFAT.   
   > I'm going to run the test again, with exFAT's cluster size at 512B.   
   >   
   >   
   > Here's all the info when the drive was formatted to both FS's.   
   > $ diskutil info /Volumes/Corsair64GB/   
   >   
   >    Device Identifier:        disk2   
   >    Device Node:              /dev/disk2   
   >    Part of Whole:            disk2   
   >    Device / Media Name:      Corsair Voyager VEGA Media   
   >    Volume Name:              Corsair64GB   
   >    Mounted:                  Yes   
   >    Mount Point:              /Volumes/Corsair64GB   
   >    File System Personality:  UDF   
   >    Type (Bundle):            udf   
   >    Name (User Visible):      Universal Disk Format (UDF)   
   >    Content (IOContent):      None   
   >    OS Can Be Installed:      No   
   >    Media Type:               Generic   
   >    Protocol:                 USB   
   >    SMART Status:             Not Supported   
   >   Total Size:               62.0 GB (61951967232 Bytes) (exactly   
   > 120999936 512-Byte-Units) Volume Free Space:        10.9 GB   
   > (10917155840 Bytes) (exactly 21322570 512-Byte-Units) Device Block   
   > Size:        512 Bytes Allocation Block Size:    512 Bytes   
   >    Read-Only Media:          No   
   >    Read-Only Volume:         No   
   >    Ejectable:                Yes   
   >    Whole:                    Yes   
   >    Internal:                 No   
   >    OS 9 Drivers:             No   
   >    Low Level Format:         Not supported   
   >   
   > exFAT   
   >   
   > $ diskutil info /Volumes/Corsair64GB/   
   >    Device Identifier:        disk2   
   >    Device Node:              /dev/disk2   
   >    Part of Whole:            disk2   
   >    Device / Media Name:      Corsair Voyager VEGA Media   
   >    Volume Name:              Corsair64GB   
   >    Mounted:                  Yes   
   >    Mount Point:              /Volumes/Corsair64GB   
   >    File System Personality:  ExFAT   
   >    Type (Bundle):            exfat   
   >    Name (User Visible):      ExFAT   
   >    Content (IOContent):      None   
   >    OS Can Be Installed:      No   
   >    Media Type:               Generic   
   >    Protocol:                 USB   
   >    SMART Status:             Not Supported   
   >    Volume UUID:              0FDE1168-F150-3E27-9CFD-CDFDB82ACE12   
   >    Total Size:               62.0 GB (61951967232 Bytes) (exactly   
   > 120999936 512-Byte-Units) Volume Free Space:        61.9 GB   
   > (61940170752 Bytes) (exactly 120976896 512-Byte-Units) Device Block   
   > Size:        512 Bytes Allocation Block Size:    131072 Bytes   
   >    Read-Only Media:          No   
   >    Read-Only Volume:         No   
   >    Ejectable:                Yes   
   >    Whole:                    Yes   
   >    Internal:                 No   
   >    OS 9 Drivers:             No   
   >    Low Level Format:         Not supported   
   >   
   >   
      
   49 minutes on exFAT with the 512B cluster size.   
      
      
   --   
   x2w7ipoprfkuvswz   
   BM-2cTJKPDb8pmp6UKJLrZdhB7SojBJrBzznT   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca