home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy      Putting Bill Gates on a giant pedestal      5,618 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,617 of 5,618   
   JEDIDIAH to Justin   
   Re: Showdown! exFAT vs UDF 2.01   
   30 Nov 15 14:52:21   
   
   XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: jedi@nomad.mishnet   
      
   On 2015-11-30, Justin  wrote:   
   > On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:39:45 -0600   
   > JEDIDIAH  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2015-11-23, Justin  wrote:   
   >> > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:07:43 -0600   
   >> > JEDIDIAH  wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On 2015-11-20, Justin  wrote:   
   >> >> > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:13:36 -0600   
   >> >> > JEDIDIAH  wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >> On 2015-11-20, Justin  wrote:   
   >> >> >> > 50 GB file - the ZIM file form wikipedia.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> ...a pointless exercise given the typical level of clue for Mac   
   >> >> >> users.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>    If you can't use it as is on MacOS, then it's a paperweight.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> [deletia]   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > Was that supposed to be English?  Here's a little hint, have a   
   >> >> > point when you make a statement.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     The comparison assumes that the typical Mac user is going to   
   >> >> reformat something or even be aware of what filesystem their using   
   >> >> (or care).   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     ...versus just ripping it out of the package and start using it   
   >> >> like I just did with an exFAT formated 200G microSD card.   
   >> >   
   >> > You can say that about most users no matter what OS they're using.   
   >>   
   >>     Like I said before...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>     Windows will also have problems if you partition an sdcard or use   
   >> some Linux format on it. This is all kind of obvious really. If you   
   >> are using a product to "be compatible" then perhaps you shouldn't   
   >> fuck around with it. You might make it so that it's not "compatible"   
   >> anymore.   
   >   
   > Yes, thats why using ext4 is clearly not an option.   
   > exFAT/FAT64 is working perfectly.  that's that we'll stick with.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>     It can be dangerous when you take the training wheels off.   
   >   
   > Was that supposed to have a point?   
   >   
   > Ignorance is bliss.   
      
       That should be your motto.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca