home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy      Putting Bill Gates on a giant pedestal      5,618 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,725 of 5,618   
   Alan to Joel W. Crump   
   Re: Sorry, Mac Fans: Linux Is Actually t   
   24 Aug 25 15:45:57   
   
   XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2025-08-24 15:33, Joel W. Crump wrote:   
   > On 8/24/2025 6:18 PM, pothead wrote:   
   >> On 2025-08-24, Joel W. Crump  wrote:   
   >>> On 8/24/2025 2:23 PM, Alan wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>> the   
   >>>>> typical home user is better off with something else [than a Mac],   
   >>>>> because of the   
   >>>>> ridiculous expense of the Apple platform, even if they like macOS,   
   >>>>> it's just throwing money down the toilet.  Maybe they have money to   
   >>>>> burn, I could understand that, but it would never click with me even   
   >>>>> if I did have a billion dollars, because my brain doesn't work that   
   >>>>> way to prefer Apple's quirkware.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Ridiculous expense"? Please.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes: my MacBook Air (M3) cost me $2,200CAD, but based on my experience,   
   >>>> this is a computer I can easily use for the next 5 years.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's $37 a month.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Even if a decent laptop with Linux cost me a third of that (and I very   
   >>>> much doubt you can find one as good for that number), the difference is   
   >>>> about $25/month.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's hardly a huge barrier to entry.   
   >>>   
   >>> The point is, for that price, you could've gotten more hardware with   
   >>> another platform.  It's like buying a Hyundai over a Honda, is it   
   >>> literally as good, maybe not in someone's OCD mind, but it's clearly a   
   >>> better value financially.   
   >>   
   >> With the exception of storage and "maybe" RAM, more doesn't equate   
   >> equally between   
   >> platforms.   
   >> The efficiency of the OS and application software plays a big part so   
   >> just because you have   
   >> a higher clocked CPU and more memory for the same amount of money   
   >> doesn't mean something like   
   >> Photoshop will run better on the higher hardware spec with Windows vs   
   >> Mac.   
   >   
   >   
   > I guess.  But Apple is still weird, even if it somehow makes such great   
   > use of their paltry offerings of hardware.   
      
   HOW is it weird? I'm guessing by "weird" you really mean, "does   
   something in a way /I/ don't like.   
      
   And what makes their offerings "paltry" exactly?   
      
   >   
   >   
   >> And on that same note, Alan is correct in that the user experience is   
   >> a combination   
   >> of software and hardware. One without the other is useless.   
   >>   
   >> You really seem to have a lot of freaky, obtuse issues with computers   
   >> that you are either   
   >> unable to accurately describe or are fantasizing about.   
   >> Maybe you should find another hobby?   
   >> Just a suggestion.   
   >   
   >   
   > Au contraire, I get results.  Everyone makes mistakes, everyone has   
   > karma, that's what killed my computer, but I bounced back hard.   
   Nothing killed my MacBook Pro except extreme old age, and even then, I   
   could have fixed it, if I'd wanted to.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca