Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy    |    Putting Bill Gates on a giant pedestal    |    5,618 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,780 of 5,618    |
|    CrudeSausage to All    |
|    Re: Sorry, Mac Fans: Linux Is Actually t    |
|    25 Aug 25 09:04:14    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy       From: crude@sausa.ge              On 2025-08-24 9:22 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       > On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 16:55:27 -0400, -hh wrote:       >       >> On 8/24/25 16:39, Joel W. Crump wrote:       >>>       >>> So you want macOS, I get it, that's fine, you do you. But you're       >>> paying through the *nose*, for the so-called privilege.       >>       >> Except for how you've utterly missed the Sam Vimes theory of boots.       >       > If Macs really did last longer and have better build quality than other       > PCs, you might have a point. As it is, you don’t.              They hold onto their value longer when it comes to resale, but that       doesn't apply to their Intel-based machines. You can get a used       Intel-based Mac for more or less the same price as a used x86-64 PC       laptop. The M-based laptops do better, but you can still get an M1       machine for fairly cheap.       > Remember, Apple has even given up on any kind of future upgradeability of       > basic things like RAM on its current machines; they are all just glorified       > laptops now.              I don't disagree here. Nevertheless, a lot of people don't care about       changing the components in their machine as much as they used to. They       should, especially since the 8GB of RAM their Mac came with is probably       not going to be enough going forward and neither is the 256GB of       storage. Still, many would rather just buy a new machine, as stupid as       that is.              Nevertheless, Apple can afford to remove the upgrade path of their       machines because they know that their customers will likely buy a new       MacBook the same way they buy a new iPhone after two years. _PC_       manufacuters can't. If you remove the potential for upgrading your       x86-64 laptop, you're also removing any decent reason to buy it over a       Mac. The Mac has superior processing power, better thermals and better       battery life. Unless there is some piece of software that absolutely       demands Windows, there is no reason whatsoever to choose a PC over a Mac.              --       God be with you,              CrudeSausage       Islam is the enemy       John 14:6              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca