XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: crude@sausa.ge   
      
   On 2025-08-25 9:58 a.m., Alan wrote:   
   > On 2025-08-25 05:56, CrudeSausage wrote:   
   >> On 2025-08-24 6:57 p.m., Alan wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-08-24 15:53, Joel W. Crump wrote:   
   >>>> On 8/24/2025 6:27 PM, Alan wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> More specifically, if you're "not wired for Apple", because you   
   >>>>>>>>> replaced it with Windows, what makes you more "wired" for that?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Windows is just WYSIWYG, Mac is quirky.  Linux requires   
   >>>>>>>> comprehension, which I have, but I'm not disliking using Windows   
   >>>>>>>> again, for now.  I haven't made my decision about replacing it   
   >>>>>>>> with Linux on this mini PC.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Unresponsive.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> In what way is Windows any more WYSIWYG than macOS?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I could be out of date, I guess, having used macOS during Snow   
   >>>>>> Leopard, but then again it hasn't really changed fundamentally,   
   >>>>>> it's counterintuitive to me.  They are on a lower intellectual   
   >>>>>> level than Microsoft, and definitely the GNU/Linux realm.  People   
   >>>>>> who click with macOS are willing to pay for the privilege, but   
   >>>>>> damn it's pricey, the hardware options not competitive with   
   >>>>>> Windows devices.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> IN WHAT SPECIFIC WAYS?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> HOW was it supposedly "counterintuitive"?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> See: I can list some ways that Windows as it stands TODAY is   
   >>>>> downright user hostile.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> 1. Windows 10 created a new application called "Settings"...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ...but you still needed to use the Control Panel for some things.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And that is still true (albeit to a lesser degree) of Windows 11.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> 2. How do you change the scrolling direction of the mouse wheel   
   >>>>> (assuming your mouse has one).   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I could go on, but believe me there are others that astound me all   
   >>>>> the time.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And overall, the fluidity--the look and feel--of the interface is   
   >>>>> just terrible! The pointer doesn't move as smoothly. The rendering   
   >>>>> of... ...everything in the UI looks terrible.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I hear you, with the way Windows settings have evolved, not being   
   >>>> entirely coherent, but File Explorer is light years better than   
   >>>> Finder as I experienced it under Snow Leopard.  Edge is better than   
   >>>> Safari, AFAIK.  Apple is just the duller minds of the industry.   
   >>> So, you're comparing which version of File Explorer to an OS that   
   >>> came out 16 years ago; Windows 7?   
   >>>   
   >>> HOW is "Edge better than Safari"? How can you possibly say "AFAIK"   
   >>> about it?   
   >>   
   >> For one, Edge uses the Chromium engine which provides for better   
   >> compatibility with websites.   
   >   
   > Who says so? I've yet to see a single problem on any site I've used.   
      
   I've read developers complaining about it but I'm with you, I have yet   
   to experience a problem. I don't have a Mac anymore, but I have no doubt   
   that if I purchased one again, there would be no issue.   
      
   >> It also provides some very decent AI functionality that is completely   
   >> absent from Safari.   
   >   
   > You mean it forces you to use Copilot.   
      
   No, it doesn't.   
      
   < snip >   
      
   --   
   God be with you,   
      
   CrudeSausage   
   Islam is the enemy   
   John 14:6   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)