Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy    |    Putting Bill Gates on a giant pedestal    |    5,618 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,815 of 5,618    |
|    Alan to CrudeSausage    |
|    Re: Sorry, Mac Fans: Linux Is Actually t    |
|    26 Aug 25 21:17:31    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2025-08-26 19:34, CrudeSausage wrote:       > On 2025-08-26 6:27 p.m., Alan wrote:       >> On 2025-08-25 12:45, CrudeSausage wrote:       >>> On 2025-08-25 9:58 a.m., Alan wrote:       >>>> On 2025-08-25 05:56, CrudeSausage wrote:       >>>>> On 2025-08-24 6:57 p.m., Alan wrote:       >>>>>> On 2025-08-24 15:53, Joel W. Crump wrote:       >>>>>>> On 8/24/2025 6:27 PM, Alan wrote:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> More specifically, if you're "not wired for Apple", because       >>>>>>>>>>>> you replaced it with Windows, what makes you more "wired"       >>>>>>>>>>>> for that?       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Windows is just WYSIWYG, Mac is quirky. Linux requires       >>>>>>>>>>> comprehension, which I have, but I'm not disliking using       >>>>>>>>>>> Windows again, for now. I haven't made my decision about       >>>>>>>>>>> replacing it with Linux on this mini PC.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> Unresponsive.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> In what way is Windows any more WYSIWYG than macOS?       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> I could be out of date, I guess, having used macOS during Snow       >>>>>>>>> Leopard, but then again it hasn't really changed fundamentally,       >>>>>>>>> it's counterintuitive to me. They are on a lower intellectual       >>>>>>>>> level than Microsoft, and definitely the GNU/Linux realm.       >>>>>>>>> People who click with macOS are willing to pay for the       >>>>>>>>> privilege, but damn it's pricey, the hardware options not       >>>>>>>>> competitive with Windows devices.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> IN WHAT SPECIFIC WAYS?       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> HOW was it supposedly "counterintuitive"?       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> See: I can list some ways that Windows as it stands TODAY is       >>>>>>>> downright user hostile.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> 1. Windows 10 created a new application called "Settings"...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> ...but you still needed to use the Control Panel for some things.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> And that is still true (albeit to a lesser degree) of Windows 11.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> 2. How do you change the scrolling direction of the mouse wheel       >>>>>>>> (assuming your mouse has one).       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> I could go on, but believe me there are others that astound me       >>>>>>>> all the time.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> And overall, the fluidity--the look and feel--of the interface       >>>>>>>> is just terrible! The pointer doesn't move as smoothly. The       >>>>>>>> rendering of... ...everything in the UI looks terrible.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> I hear you, with the way Windows settings have evolved, not being       >>>>>>> entirely coherent, but File Explorer is light years better than       >>>>>>> Finder as I experienced it under Snow Leopard. Edge is better       >>>>>>> than Safari, AFAIK. Apple is just the duller minds of the industry.       >>>>>> So, you're comparing which version of File Explorer to an OS that       >>>>>> came out 16 years ago; Windows 7?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> HOW is "Edge better than Safari"? How can you possibly say "AFAIK"       >>>>>> about it?       >>>>>       >>>>> For one, Edge uses the Chromium engine which provides for better       >>>>> compatibility with websites.       >>>>       >>>> Who says so? I've yet to see a single problem on any site I've used.       >>>       >>> I've read developers complaining about it but I'm with you, I have       >>> yet to experience a problem. I don't have a Mac anymore, but I have       >>> no doubt that if I purchased one again, there would be no issue.       >>>       >>>>> It also provides some very decent AI functionality that is       >>>>> completely absent from Safari.       >>>>       >>>> You mean it forces you to use Copilot.       >>>       >>> No, it doesn't.       >> Interesting.       >>       >> What "AI functionality" is there in Edge that isn't tied to using       >> Copilot?       >>       >> I'm genuinely asking.       >       > What I'm saying is that you are not obligated to use any of the AI       > functionality. It's tied to search, and you can use AI to produce some       > nice images related to a description you write, but it is otherwise no       > better than any other browser.       And what I'm saying is that if you WANT to use AI functionality in Edge,       it is going to be Microsoft's AI you use.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca