Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy    |    Putting Bill Gates on a giant pedestal    |    5,618 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,863 of 5,618    |
|    CrudeSausage to Alan    |
|    Re: Sorry, Mac Fans: Linux Is Actually t    |
|    30 Aug 25 12:35:28    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy       From: crude@sausa.ge              On 2025-08-30 12:11 p.m., Alan wrote:       > On 2025-08-30 08:29, CrudeSausage wrote:       >> On 2025-08-28 9:12 p.m., Alan wrote:       >>> On 2025-08-28 19:23, Joel W. Crump wrote:       >>>> On 8/28/2025 2:31 PM, Alan wrote:       >>>>> On 2025-08-28 12:12, CrudeSausage wrote:       >>>>>> On 2025-08-28 10:53 a.m., Alan wrote:       >>>>>>> On 2025-08-28 00:12, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Linux is becoming more and more dominant, that’s what’s changed.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Yeah!       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> In the last two years it's gone from 3.12% share to 3.98%.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Any day now.       >>>>>>> 🤣🤣🤣       >>>>>>       >>>>>> There is no denying that Linux owns the server market. Neither       >>>>>> Windows nor Mac OS can deliver the kind of advantages a mere Linux       >>>>>> server can. Nevertheless, Microsoft seems to be the one making the       >>>>>> most money using a Linux server software through Azure.       >>>>>       >>>>> Where the chief "advantage" is cost, yes.       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> Wrong, idiot, you're so desperate to make a point about your lame       >>>> platform, that you say something so stupid, no, Windows servers have       >>>> their place, but Linux is much more designed to function in the       >>>> average server purposes, that is undeniable, you are a moron.       >>> In what way is it "much more designed to function"?       >>>       >>> What does it have that macOS would not that makes it better as a server?       >>       >> Linux doesn't have the overhead that MacOS would have for server       >> purposes.       >       > What overhead would that be?              The necessity of a GUI to execute the tasks you would complete in the       Linux console. If you can demonstrate how there is no need for a GUI on       a Mac server compared to a Linux server, you are free to do so.              >> You can do pretty much everything in the Linux console whereas Apple       >> doesn't usually prioritize that part of their operating system.       >       > It doesn't put it forward to ordinary users...       >       > ...but it still exists.              People who manage servers aren't ordinary users.              >> Besides, we've been in this situation before. I recall when Apple       >> tried to push its Gx series servers in the mid-2000s. Absolutely no       >> one wanted them because the performance was laughable whereas the cost       >> was enormous. If I remember correctly, the company also expected you       >> to do everything through a GUI.       > But you didn't have to.              Prove it.              --       God be with you,              CrudeSausage       Islam is the enemy       John 14:6              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca