XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: crude@sausa.ge   
      
   On 2025-08-31 12:08 a.m., Alan wrote:   
   > On 2025-08-30 12:35, CrudeSausage wrote:   
   >> On 2025-08-30 12:11 p.m., Alan wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-08-30 08:29, CrudeSausage wrote:   
   >>>> On 2025-08-28 9:12 p.m., Alan wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2025-08-28 19:23, Joel W. Crump wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 8/28/2025 2:31 PM, Alan wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 2025-08-28 12:12, CrudeSausage wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2025-08-28 10:53 a.m., Alan wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2025-08-28 00:12, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Linux is becoming more and more dominant, that’s what’s changed.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Yeah!   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> In the last two years it's gone from 3.12% share to 3.98%.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Any day now.   
   >>>>>>>>> 🤣🤣🤣   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> There is no denying that Linux owns the server market. Neither   
   >>>>>>>> Windows nor Mac OS can deliver the kind of advantages a mere   
   >>>>>>>> Linux server can. Nevertheless, Microsoft seems to be the one   
   >>>>>>>> making the most money using a Linux server software through Azure.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Where the chief "advantage" is cost, yes.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Wrong, idiot, you're so desperate to make a point about your lame   
   >>>>>> platform, that you say something so stupid, no, Windows servers   
   >>>>>> have their place, but Linux is much more designed to function in   
   >>>>>> the average server purposes, that is undeniable, you are a moron.   
   >>>>> In what way is it "much more designed to function"?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What does it have that macOS would not that makes it better as a   
   >>>>> server?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Linux doesn't have the overhead that MacOS would have for server   
   >>>> purposes.   
   >>>   
   >>> What overhead would that be?   
   >>   
   >> The necessity of a GUI to execute the tasks you would complete in the   
   >> Linux console. If you can demonstrate how there is no need for a GUI   
   >> on a Mac server compared to a Linux server, you are free to do so.   
   >   
   > Except you can do the tasks on the console from macOS.   
      
   Every task? Doubtful. Either way, prove it.   
      
   >>>> You can do pretty much everything in the Linux console whereas Apple   
   >>>> doesn't usually prioritize that part of their operating system.   
   >>>   
   >>> It doesn't put it forward to ordinary users...   
   >>>   
   >>> ...but it still exists.   
   >>   
   >> People who manage servers aren't ordinary users.   
   >   
   > And?   
   >   
   > Not prioritizing something doesn't mean it doesn't exist   
      
   Running MacOS on your server is like buying a Chevrolet Cobalt for drag   
   races.   
      
   >>>> Besides, we've been in this situation before. I recall when Apple   
   >>>> tried to push its Gx series servers in the mid-2000s. Absolutely no   
   >>>> one wanted them because the performance was laughable whereas the   
   >>>> cost was enormous. If I remember correctly, the company also   
   >>>> expected you to do everything through a GUI.   
   >>> But you didn't have to.   
   >>   
   >> Prove it.   
   > I used to DO it.   
      
   And you have yet to prove it.   
      
   --   
   God be with you,   
      
   CrudeSausage   
   Islam is the enemy   
   John 14:6   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)