Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy    |    Putting Bill Gates on a giant pedestal    |    5,618 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,903 of 5,618    |
|    CrudeSausage to Joel W. Crump    |
|    Re: Sorry, Linux Fans: Mac Is Actually t    |
|    03 Sep 25 19:32:00    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy       From: crude@sausa.ge              On 2025-09-03 7:10 p.m., Joel W. Crump wrote:       > On 9/2/2025 5:05 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:       >> On 2025-09-01 7:47 p.m., Joel W. Crump wrote:       >>       >>>> Then it is basically like the product keys that are tied to the       >>>> motherboard, allowing you to install and reinstall Windows without       >>>> the need to enter the product key at installation time. As far as I       >>>> know, they are still called OEM keys. If you don't mind buying       >>>> another license the moment you change computers, there is nothing       >>>> wrong with them. Nevertheless, I don't believe that Microsoft       >>>> charges manufacturers as little as $20 to put Windows on their       >>>> hardware legally. That's why the fact that they can be purchased for       >>>> so little is sketchy to me.       >>>       >>> They go through large organizations that eventually sell unused       >>> licenses.       >>       >> Then it sounds legal to me. I'll have to pick one up that way if ever       >> I need to buy a new license in the future.       >       >       > It probably violates an agreement with Microsoft (but not involving       > you), but it's tolerated.              I don't mind legal loopholes. Besides, I don't think Microsoft actually       minds that someone paid much less for a license as long as they're using       Windows.              >> It happens that computer output doesn't appear on televisions. It       >> often has to do with the fact that either the refresh rate or the       >> resolution isn't exactly what it says it is. For example, my 2008 Sony       >> 32" LCD TV is 720p/1080i but supports 1080p (even though it isn't       >> advertised). Nevertheless, if you run 720p or 1080p content on it,       >> you'll notice that some of the content isn't on the screen. The sides       >> are missing some content. It's quite possible, if the television isn't       >> from a reputable brand, that it simply didn't show anything because no       >> PC resolution or refresh rate was supported on it.       >       > The TV was turned off and I really felt bad when I realized how simple       > the problem was.              For what it's worth, most televisions make piss poor monitors.              --       God be with you,              CrudeSausage       Islam is the enemy       John 14:6              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca