Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy    |    Putting Bill Gates on a giant pedestal    |    5,618 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 5,018 of 5,618    |
|    Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to Paul    |
|    Re: Mightgrowsoft Removes Even More Acco    |
|    12 Oct 25 06:13:32    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11       From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 23:29:02 -0400, Paul wrote:              > On Sat, 10/11/2025 6:47 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>       >> On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 23:04:19 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>       >>> How on earth are people like the military going to install and run       >>> Windows in machines that are completely disconnected from       >>> internet?       >>       >> I wonder why they would be using an OS that can’t even offer       >> regular civilian-grade security, never mind military-grade ...       >>       > I don't expect Microsoft treats their military partners quite the       > way they treat consumers.       >       > If you know the right keywords, you can find the odd tidbit.       >       > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/secauthz/c2-level-security              “Service currently unavailable” ... but last I checked, the only way       Windows could achieve that level of Orange Book security was by       disabling any network access.              Now, you *do* know that Microsoft is moving towards requiring a       Microsoft account in order to activate Dimdows, right? Which means an       Internet connection will be mandatory.              Do you see the problem here?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca