XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11   
   From: this@ddress.is.invalid   
      
   Lawrence D?Oliveiro  wrote:   
   > On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 23:29:02 -0400, Paul wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sat, 10/11/2025 6:47 PM, Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 23:04:19 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>> How on earth are people like the military going to install and run   
   > >>> Windows in machines that are completely disconnected from   
   > >>> internet?   
   > >>   
   > >> I wonder why they would be using an OS that can?t even offer   
   > >> regular civilian-grade security, never mind military-grade ...   
   > >>   
   > > I don't expect Microsoft treats their military partners quite the   
   > > way they treat consumers.   
   > >   
   > > If you know the right keywords, you can find the odd tidbit.   
   > >   
   > > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/secauthz/c2-level-security   
   >   
   > ?Service currently unavailable? ... but last I checked, the only way   
   > Windows could achieve that level of Orange Book security was by   
   > disabling any network access.   
   >   
   > Now, you *do* know that Microsoft is moving towards requiring a   
   > Microsoft account in order to activate Dimdows, right? Which means an   
   > Internet connection will be mandatory.   
      
     Unlikely for Pro and similar versions. And, as Winston points out,   
   irrelevant for managed systems, which obviously is the case for Carlos'   
   example of 'the military'.   
      
   > Do you see the problem here?   
      
     Yes, we see your FUD and you having no clue.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)