XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11   
   From: robin_listas@es.invalid   
      
   On 2025-10-12 12:14, Frank Slootweg wrote:   
   > Lawrence D?Oliveiro  wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 23:29:02 -0400, Paul wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 10/11/2025 6:47 PM, Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 23:04:19 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> How on earth are people like the military going to install and run   
   >>>>> Windows in machines that are completely disconnected from   
   >>>>> internet?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I wonder why they would be using an OS that can?t even offer   
   >>>> regular civilian-grade security, never mind military-grade ...   
   >>>>   
   >>> I don't expect Microsoft treats their military partners quite the   
   >>> way they treat consumers.   
   >>>   
   >>> If you know the right keywords, you can find the odd tidbit.   
   >>>   
   >>> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/secauthz/c2-level-security   
   >>   
   >> ?Service currently unavailable? ... but last I checked, the only way   
   >> Windows could achieve that level of Orange Book security was by   
   >> disabling any network access.   
   >>   
   >> Now, you *do* know that Microsoft is moving towards requiring a   
   >> Microsoft account in order to activate Dimdows, right? Which means an   
   >> Internet connection will be mandatory.   
   >   
   >    Unlikely for Pro and similar versions. And, as Winston points out,   
   > irrelevant for managed systems, which obviously is the case for Carlos'   
   > example of 'the military'.   
   >   
   >> Do you see the problem here?   
   >   
   >    Yes, we see your FUD and you having no clue.   
      
   Then please explain.   
      
      
      
   --   
   Cheers, Carlos.   
   ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)