Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy    |    Putting Bill Gates on a giant pedestal    |    5,618 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 5,135 of 5,618    |
|    Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to Brock McNuggets    |
|    Re: 5 Linux Desktop Environments That Ma    |
|    27 Nov 25 08:05:05    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: ldo@nz.invalid              On 27 Nov 2025 07:02:35 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:              > On Nov 26, 2025 at 11:36:31 PM MST, "Lawrence D´Oliveiro" wrote       > <10g8rhf$158qm$2@dont-email.me>:       >       >> On 27 Nov 2025 06:35:42 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:       >>       >>> On Nov 26, 2025 at 10:30:09 PM MST, "Lawrence D´Oliveiro" wrote       >>> <10g8nl1$13t7t$2@dont-email.me>:       >>>       >>>> Both companies have spent decades conditioning their user base to be       >>>> allergic to the command line.       >>>       >>> Both macOS and Windows have a command line.       >>       >> Supposedly.       >       > No. Factually.              Wonder why they needed to bring in actual Linux, then.              > As you have noted, Linux also seeks to bring in things from Windows and       > to some extent macOS.              Its GUI heritage comes from Unix, not from Windows or MacOS.              > * NTFS & exFAT: They were not a part of the Linux kernel for some time.       > Now they are.              They are there for compatibility, not because they are a good idea. Linux       has much superior filesystems available -- that cope better with lots of       small files, just for example.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca