From: davef@tsoft-inc.com   
      
   On 12/3/2024 9:40 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:   
   > On 12/2/2024 11:57 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 03:09:15 -0000 (UTC), Waldek Hebisch wrote:   
   >>>  From what you wrote seem that ESXi is more similar to Xen than to   
   >>> KVM+qemu, that is ESXi and Xen discourage running unvirtualized programs   
   >>> while in KVM+qemu some (frequently most) programs is running   
   >>> unvirtualized and only rest is virtualized.   
   >>   
   >> I think that dates back to the old distinction between “type 1” and   
   “type   
   >> 2“ hypervisors. It’s an obsolete distinction nowadays.   
   >   
   > No.   
   >   
   > If you look at what is available and what it is used for then you will   
   > see that what is labeled type 1 is used for production and what is   
   > labeled type 2 is used for development. It matters.   
   >   
   > Arne   
   >   
      
   Is that a hard rule?  I doubt it.   
      
   Though, some may feel that the "type 1" (whatever that really is, or matters)   
   might be a bit safer ...   
      
   --   
   David Froble                       Tel: 724-529-0450   
   Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc.      E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.com   
   DFE Ultralights, Inc.   
   170 Grimplin Road   
   Vanderbilt, PA  15486   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)