Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,162 of 264,096    |
|    Chris Townley to Dave Froble    |
|    Re: Screen management in C    |
|    30 Dec 24 01:39:36    |
      From: news@cct-net.co.uk              On 30/12/2024 01:08, Dave Froble wrote:       > On 12/27/2024 8:10 PM, Chris Townley wrote:       >> On 28/12/2024 00:32, Arne Vajhøj wrote:       >>> On 12/27/2024 3:54 PM, Single Stage to Orbit wrote:       >>>> On Fri, 2024-12-27 at 14:34 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote:       >>>>>> This has been discussed previously here:       >>>>>>       >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.vms/c/ufBEqvGdglU       >>>>>>       >>>>>> That discussion has pointers to various examples,       >>>>>       >>>>> In general VMS Pascal/VMS Basic code should be maybe 25% shorter       >>>>> than equivalent C code. But with a descriptor centric API like       >>>>> SMG$ then it may be more like 40% shorter.       >>>>>       >>>>> One could make a nice wrapper in C++ encapsulating the context       >>>>> and convert between stl::string / C char array and descriptors.       >>>>>       >>>>> But then a full screen VT UI is a concept that has been obsolete       >>>>> for 30 years, so maybe there is little point.       >>>>       >>>> People are still writing apps using the console.       >>>       >>> There is still a need to write command line tools. Mostly       >>> for system administrators and developers, but still there.       >>>       >>> But full screen VT UI applications? I doubt many of those       >>> get written today. Whether custom code using SMG$ or one       >>> of TDMS/FMS/DECForms. The end users expectations for UI       >>> has changed. GUI or Web.       >>>       >>> Arne       >>>       >> In the mid naughties I used SMG to provide a better UI for HHTs on the       >> shop       >> floor - using a terminal emulator on the HHTs       >>       >> Far better than the earlier implementation.       >>       >> This was in Basic, where I wrote a couple of functions to front end       >> it, then       >> called the SMG routines.       >>       >> Went down well on the shop floor       >>       >       > And let me guess, a WEENDOZE GUI might not work so well on the shop floor?              Not that we got a chance, but I don't think it would have - especially       on a 12 X 21 character display!              --       Chris              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca