Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,337 of 264,096    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= to Lawrence D'Oliveiro    |
|    Re: basic BASIC question    |
|    03 Feb 25 20:53:00    |
      From: arne@vajhoej.dk              On 2/3/2025 8:18 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:       > On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 19:32:35 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote:       >> On 2/3/2025 5:05 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:       >>> Trouble is, every other notation for string literals requires some kind       >>> of escape system for representing characters that might interfere with       >>> the syntax notation itself.       >>       >> True. But that does not seem to be a problem.       >       > I know. Normal people see it as an absolute nightmare to try to calculate       > a count prefix. But surely any self-respecting editor makes that easy,       > e.g.       >       > 44HThe quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.       >       > It only took me a few seconds in Emacs, even without the benefit of a       > custom command to make it faster.              Note that the above seems to be a hollerith edit descriptor (deleted in       Fortran 95 standard) and not a hollerith constant (deleted in       Fortran 77 standard). Counting is not a problem in hollerith constants,       but changing the string can be.              Arne              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca