Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,645 of 264,096    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to All    |
|    Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base    |
|    17 Apr 25 23:26:39    |
   
   From: ldo@nz.invalid   
      
   On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:56:17 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:   
      
   > If we discuss what is the "right" answer, then I would actually say 2.   
   >   
   > for i := 1 to 10 do writeln(i)   
   >   
   > for i := 1 to 10 do   
   > writeln(i)   
   >   
   > for i := 1 to 10 do begin   
   > writeln(i)   
   > end;   
   >   
   > for i := 1 to 10 do begin   
   > writeln(i)   
   > end;   
   >   
   > for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++) printf("%d\n", i);   
   >   
   > for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++)   
   > printf("%d\n", i);   
   >   
   > for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {   
   > printf("%d\n", i);   
   > }   
   >   
   > for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++)   
   > {   
   > printf("%d\n", i);   
   > }   
   >   
   > I would say 2 for all.   
      
   How much difference would such distinctions make in real-world code,   
   anyway? I suspect not much. Longer compound statements would dominate   
   shorter ones in the line count.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca