Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,748 of 264,096    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to All    |
|    Re: Bootcamp    |
|    03 Jul 25 22:39:15    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 10:56:26 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:              > 5) The idea of emulating one OS on another OS is questionable       > in itself. It is not that difficult to achieve 90-95%       > compatibility. But 100% compatibility is very hard. Because       > the core OS design tend to spill over into       > userland semantics. It is always tricky to emulate *nix       > on VMS and it would be be tricky to emulate VMS on *nix.              It was always tricky to emulate *nix on proprietary OSes. But emulating       proprietary OSes on Linux does actually work a lot better. Look at WINE,       which has progressed to the point where it can be the basis of a       successful shipping product (the Steam Deck) that lets users run Windows       games without Windows. That works so well, it puts true Windows-based       handheld competitors in the shade.              That has never been done before. And it’s got to be a more difficult job       than emulating VMS, with its much simpler APIs.              > Getting DCL, image activation, process permanent files,       > subprocesses, logicals and symbols working 100% compatible on a       > Linux kernel would not be easy. A lot hang on the 4 mode design and       > DCL being in S.              We don’t need to emulate the internals of DCL. We just need to be able to       run users’ command procedures.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca