Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,903 of 264,096    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to All    |
|    Re: VMS x86-64 database server    |
|    23 Jul 25 00:54:01    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 20:26:46 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:              > You have misunderstood what an ORM provide.       >       > You need to define your object model.       >       > You need to specify logical what queries or updates you want to do.       >       > What the ORM does (as the name implies!) is to handle the mapping       > between the object model and the SQL statements.       >       > You give it a query and it translate that into one or more SELECT       > statements, read the result and stuff it into the object model.       >       > You tell it to persist an object and it translate that into one or more       > INSERT statements.       >       > For complex object models having that stuff done automatically save a       > ton of code.       >       > It is cutting 50-75% of the database access code. And most business       > applications has a lot of database access code.              The trouble is, SQL is already a very concise language. So the idea that       you can add some kind of ORM to, say, Java, a language not known for its       conciseness, in order to save code overall, is just absurd.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca