From: jgd@cix.co.uk   
      
   In article <10c61pt$sa8$1@reader2.panix.com>,   
   cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) wrote:   
      
   > Yeah, I understand the profiles idea, but it's supporting that   
   > smaller set of extensions discoverable at run-time that's the   
   > problem.  I know a lot of people working on RISC-V firmware, and   
   > this (and the forced use of the SBI) seems to be the major   
   > sources of friction.  Folks have gone as far as calling it a   
   > "soft core target."   
      
   Aha. I'd be working on application libraries, and would simply assume the   
   basics of the profile and ignore the optional parts. Different viewpoint.   
      
      
   John   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)