Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 263,508 of 264,096    |
|    Andrew Back to David Wade    |
|    Re: VMS previous DEC/CPQ/HP[E] decisions    |
|    10 Oct 25 12:11:17    |
      From: andrew@carrierdetect.com              On 17/09/2025 00:25, David Wade wrote:              > Interesting point. So LPARS are physical partitioning. I guess almost a       > type-0 hypervisor. You can't over commit. However its part of the       > hardware so basically "free". Given you get a minimum of 68 cores in any       > current Z box it isn't usually a problem. If you need to over-commit       > then you can buy zVM a type-1 hypervisor which is really a re-badged VM/       > XA from the 1970s.              My understanding was that LPARs as configured using PR/SM are logical       resources in terms of CPU, managed using using a derivative of VM       integrated at firmware level, hence not physical partitioning as I'd       understand it (such as how a Sun E10K manages this).              A quick search turned up IBM documentation which has the line "Shared       Logical CPUs assigned to LPARs":                     https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zp-and-ca/3.1.0?topic=simulation-cecs-prsm-lpars              Well, just the name "Logical" suggests not physical partitioning.              Happy to be corrected. It's not my area of expertise and keen to improve       my understanding.              Andrew              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca