From: news@cct-net.co.uk   
      
   On 13/10/2025 21:38, Arne Vajhøj wrote:   
   > On 10/13/2025 6:41 AM, David Wade wrote:   
   >> On 13/10/2025 11:57, Chris Townley wrote:   
   >>> On 13/10/2025 02:07, Arne Vajhøj wrote:   
   >>>> Seeing a good long term business for selling proprietary Unix   
   >>>> for x86-64 require a very good imagination.   
   >>>   
   >>> Red Hat do well out of it, although not quite propriety, not quite   
   >>> open source...   
   >>>   
   >> RedHat have worked hard to make it impossible to use their Linux   
   >> without paying. In addition they do well because in order to comply   
   >> with many security policies you need supported software.   
   >>   
   >> So unless you are the French Gendarmerie, who have their own Linux   
   >> Distro, you need to pay RedHat for support. Its not cheap   
   >   
   > RHEL product management is getting squeezed. The IBM bean counters   
   > want higher profit. And sale is dropping due to companies moving   
   > their Linux workload from on-prem RHEL to cloud non-RHEL. So they   
   > have done some "crazy" stuff to make it harder for RHEL clones.   
   >   
   > But RHEL clones still exist. Rocky, Alma, Oracle, Amazon etc..   
   > Redhat's changes may have reduced compatibility from 100%   
   > to 99.95%, but my impression is that the industry in general   
   > consider the compatibility acceptable.   
   >   
   > Support is easy. If you need support you pay. Redhat is still   
   > an obvious choice in that case. But few make that choice, because   
   > most only provide containers and let the cloud vendor provide   
   > the host Linux. And they don't want to pay Redhat.   
   >   
   > Arne   
      
   My former company would only use RHEL   
      
   --   
   Chris   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)