Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 263,553 of 264,096    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= to Chris Townley    |
|    Re: VMS previous DEC/CPQ/HP[E] decisions    |
|    13 Oct 25 19:23:03    |
      From: arne@vajhoej.dk              On 10/13/2025 5:53 PM, Chris Townley wrote:       > On 13/10/2025 21:38, Arne Vajhøj wrote:       >> On 10/13/2025 6:41 AM, David Wade wrote:       >>> On 13/10/2025 11:57, Chris Townley wrote:       >>>> On 13/10/2025 02:07, Arne Vajhøj wrote:       >>>>> Seeing a good long term business for selling proprietary Unix       >>>>> for x86-64 require a very good imagination.       >>>>       >>>> Red Hat do well out of it, although not quite propriety, not quite       >>>> open source...       >>>>       >>> RedHat have worked hard to make it impossible to use their Linux       >>> without paying. In addition they do well because in order to comply       >>> with many security policies you need supported software.       >>>       >>> So unless you are the French Gendarmerie, who have their own Linux       >>> Distro, you need to pay RedHat for support. Its not cheap       >>       >> RHEL product management is getting squeezed. The IBM bean counters       >> want higher profit. And sale is dropping due to companies moving       >> their Linux workload from on-prem RHEL to cloud non-RHEL. So they       >> have done some "crazy" stuff to make it harder for RHEL clones.       >>       >> But RHEL clones still exist. Rocky, Alma, Oracle, Amazon etc..       >> Redhat's changes may have reduced compatibility from 100%       >> to 99.95%, but my impression is that the industry in general       >> consider the compatibility acceptable.       >>       >> Support is easy. If you need support you pay. Redhat is still       >> an obvious choice in that case. But few make that choice, because       >> most only provide containers and let the cloud vendor provide       >> the host Linux. And they don't want to pay Redhat.       >       > My former company would only use RHEL              On-prem I assume?              Because paying the cloud vendor for VM's, installing       RHEL and Kubernetes (in form of Openshift for a Redhat       shop) instead of just using EKS/AKS/GKE would be       "unusual".              Arne              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca