Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 263,656 of 264,096    |
|    Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to All    |
|    Re: And so? (VMS/XDE)    |
|    01 Nov 25 22:13:08    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 17:44:02 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:              > On 10/30/2025 6:26 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>       >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:52:07 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:       >>>       >>> Developers are important for an OS!       >>       >> Users attract developers, not so much the other way round.       >       > No applications mean no users. Nobody is interested in a platform       > with no applications.              And yet Android succeeded, even as the leading developers turned up       their noses at it. They much preferred Apple’s platform.              >> Look at Iphone versus Android: Apple’s platform was seen as way       >> cooler, and attracted more of the cool developers. So it got more       >> apps. But Android offered a wider range of choice and       >> out-of-the-box functionality. That attracted the users. It took       >> years for Android to close the app gap, nevertheless that wasn’t       >> enough to keep Iphone dominant.       >       > It took some years before Android got more millions of apps than       > iOS.       >       > But having most millions of apps does not matter. What matters is       > that the platform has the apps that are important.              Which ones were important in the beginning? The big ones on Iphone       were simply not available on Android.              > And it did not take long before most of the important       > apps supported both Android and iOS.       >       >> Remember Windows Phone? But in its user experience it was trying       >> too much to ape Apple, which is why it lost out to Android.       >       > There were multiple reasons for WP's failure. But the most important       > was probably lack of apps.              > Microsoft was paying major developers to put apps on its platform.       > It didn’t help.       >       > Lots of of people did buy a WP device. Sales topped around 35       > million/year. Still way behind Android and iOS, but not bad.              Why was Nokia, the leading Windows Phone device maker, losing money so       badly, then?              > Companies decided to support iOS and Android.              Initially it was only IOS. They only added Android *after* it became       popular.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca