Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 263,749 of 264,096    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= to Brian Schenkenberger    |
|    Re: VMS Bootcamp    |
|    12 Nov 25 18:49:36    |
      From: arne@vajhoej.dk              On 11/12/2025 6:39 PM, Brian Schenkenberger wrote:       > On 2025-11-12 13:04:23 +0000, Dan Cross said:       >> I suspect that there is a lot of business code floating around       >> in memory-unsafe languages (MACRO-32, Pascal, maybe COBOL if       >> used in some odd ways) etc. Not to mention FFI calls from safe       >> languages into unsafe code.       >       > What *exactly* is memory unsafe using Macro?              Just about everything.              :-)              But let us start with the definition of memory unsafe.              Wikipedia:              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_safety              My short version:       * no out of bounds check for array index       * allowing use of deallocated memory       * memory leak due to memory never being deallocated              Macro-32 does not take care of that - it leaves it all       to the developer.              Which would not be a problem if we had a million VAXMAN's,       but we don't, so it is a problem.              > You do realize that the       > lion's share of VMS is Macro???              That code was written a long time ago.              Arne              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca