Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,096 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 263,838 of 264,096    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= to Chris Townley    |
|    Re: And so? (VMS/XDE)    |
|    30 Nov 25 17:44:29    |
      From: arne@vajhoej.dk              On 11/30/2025 4:49 PM, Chris Townley wrote:       > On 30/11/2025 21:09, Arne Vajhøj wrote:       >> On 11/30/2025 4:04 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:       >> The selling point is the automatic persistence of global       >> variables:       >       > Why would you want that?              It is pretty smart for persistence - instead of various       API calls doing SQL or ORM or whatever, then you just let       the variable name start with ^ and the system handles       both retrieving and storing the data.              But I guess you wonder over labeling it global variables.              Well - this is before my time, so this is just guessing.              When MUMPS were invented then RAM was very expensive. According       to Wikipdia then MUMPS first ran on a PDP-7 and PDP-9. And       a PDP-9 came standard with 8192 words of RAM. Yuck.              So having one big program with data in global variables in       RAM and calling a bunch of subroutines to work on the data       may not have fit into RAM.              Instead having the global variables on disk and having       multiple small standalone programs working on the data       may fit better.              Arne              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca