Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.vms    |    DEC's VAX* line of computers & VMS.    |    264,129 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 263,968 of 264,129    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= to All    |
|    Re: DCL2    |
|    15 Dec 25 11:58:21    |
      From: arne@vajhoej.dk              On 12/13/2025 8:45 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       > On Sat, 06 Dec 2025 11:42:47 +0100, Marc Van Dyck wrote:       >> User written lexical functions, on the other hand, would be a real       >> bonus. There are, for one, still many parts of the operating system for       >> which you need to get information, and the only possible way to do it is       >> to parse some output (think of everything TCP/IP, for example), while       >> there is a callable interface available to get the info properly.       >       > POSIXish shells seem to feel less need for such built-in extensions.       >       > Is this a reflection on the ease of doing command substitutions in them,       > vis-à-vis DCL?              The Linux way is pseudo files instead of lexical functions.              The difference between:        cat some pseudo file        process output       and:        execute some program        process output       is practically none.              While the difference between:        $ res = f$something()       and:        execute some program        process output       is big.              So no surprise that VMS people see the need but Linux does not.              Arne              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca