From: aminer68@gmail.com   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
   More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about my   
   philosophy..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
   You have to understand my contributions as a philosopher by reading my    
   philosophy, but one of my contribution of my philosophy is also related    
   to the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since the philosopher Friedrich   
   Nietzsche articulated ethical dilemma as a tension between the master vs.   
   slave morality; the former in which we make decisions based on the assessment   
   of consequences, and the    
   latter in which we make decisions based on our conception of good vs. evil,   
   but you have to understand my    
   contribution of my philosophy about morality, since the first of my   
   contribution about morality is that i am giving a kind of logical proof that   
   morality is "universal", but not only that but i have invented quickly a   
   proverb that abstract much more    
   correctly morality so that you understand more, so read it below, so i think   
   from my thoughts below of my contribution to philosophy, that the philosopher   
   Friedrich Nietzsche is not so smart, since you will understand from my   
   thoughts below of my    
   philosophy that morality of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an Elitist   
   morality called in his philosophy the morality of the master, but notice that   
   he is not so smart, since the morality of the master in his philosophy has the   
   "tendency" to be    
   great "performance" of perfection, so this is why it can be morality that   
   oppresses people,    
   so we can then say that morality of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is    
   the not correct morality, since here again you are noticing that Democracy is   
   a tool that permit to avoid such oppression of the morality    
   of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to read   
   again some of my contributions to philosophy about morality in my following   
   thoughts, but first i invite you to read my following thoughts    
   of my philosophy about Utilitrianism so that to understand more that morality   
   of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not the correct one:   
      
   More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more..   
      
   I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand   
   another very important thing, and it is that my redefinition of   
   Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true",   
   since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and   
   well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future   
   consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to   
   be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so   
   then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical   
   analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial   
   intelligence, since to not get stuck in a local minimum we have to not   
   to "homogenize" in the society the rule of Utilitarianism since there is   
   also the weakest members of the society that can not be able to be this   
   maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i   
   think that it is like evolutionary algorithms in artificial   
   intelligence, so we have to be smart when managing and ruling in   
   Democracy. So notice that i have first talked in my below thoughts about   
   the definition of Utilitarianism that doesn't take into account my   
   redefinition below of Utilitarianism that make the rule of   
   Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", and i am after that giving my   
   redefinition of Utilitarianism, so read it again:   
      
   More of my philosophy about Utilitarianism and more..   
      
   So as you are noticing that in my previous post i have talked about what   
   is the best positive energy that make us a much better world, read it   
   below, but am i for Utilitarianism 100% by talking as i am talking about   
   this positive energy ? i will answer that you have to know that   
   Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being   
   for all affected individuals, so i think this "prescribes" means like   
   "recommend", since we are also ruled by Democracy that makes the rule   
   of Utilitarianism compatible with Democracy, so this prescribes is not   
   dictatorship, and this maximize of Utilitarianism is the best way, and   
   you have to also understand my redefinition of Utilitarianism that   
   abstract much more correctly, and here is my redefinition of Utilitarianism:   
      
   More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like   
   an IQ test..   
      
   Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the   
   definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern   
   with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition   
   of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that   
   maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,   
   i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am   
   smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and   
   well-being by well balancing taking into account not   
   only the present but also the future, i mean that responability   
   is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us   
   to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize   
   correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.   
      
   I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and   
   here it is:   
      
   So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid   
   intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:   
      
   So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country   
   called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?   
      
   It is like my IQ test..   
      
   So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go   
   fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need   
   the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be   
   "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has   
   too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take   
   into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so   
   you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.   
      
   More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..   
      
   I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:   
      
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism   
      
   So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions   
   that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,   
   but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)