Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.programming    |    Programming issues that transcend langua    |    57,431 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 55,482 of 57,431    |
|    Meredith Montgomery to All    |
|    a kind of a web-shell-api for managing l    |
|    30 Dec 21 17:16:08    |
      XPost: comp.unix.programmer       From: mmontgomery@levado.to              I'm helping someone to improve a CMS-type of web system. This web       system sometimes needs to run some background processes --- such as send       a batch of e-mail or other process that takes a while to finish.              I see the challenge here as just writing something that will look like a       very basic UNIX shell --- so I'll call it ``web-api-shell'' from now on.       (``Web'' because it will be used by a web system through some API.)              This thing must run really well. It has to be flawless. I'm looking       for design principles and advice.              (*) Where will it run              It will run on GNU systems running the Linux kernel.              (*) My own thoughts              The interface to shell will be through HTTP requests, so this shell will       likely be a web server of some sort. But before I get involved in the       web at all, I need the shell working flawlessly.              So I need a laboratory first. I could write a program that reads some       named pipe on disk to get commands such as ``run this or that'' while I       work. (Later I can write a web server replacing this named-pipe       interface.)              Just like a UNIX shell, this web-api-shell must know all every process       it runs. I suppose the work is essentially fork(), execve() followed by       waitpid().              One concern I have is the following. Is it possible for a process to       simply ``get out of'' the shell? What do I mean by that? A process       that does fork() and puts itself into background would leave the       web-api-shell's control, wouldn't it?              I think I must avoid that. Perhaps I can't let just any process run.       Perhaps the web-api-shell must only offer a few processes carefully       written by myself --- so that I know they won't put themselves in       background. (For instance, I can't let them change PIDs, otherwise I       won't have any idea who they are and that's a mess. I'd love to somehow       restrict system calls such as fork().)              (*) What is my level of training?              In the past I've studied many parts of               Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment        W. Richard Stevens              I will definitely have to read it again to get work on this project.       Can you mention any UNIX concepts that are of great relevance for this       project? I don't think I ever got my mind wrapped around things like       sessions, session leaders and so on. Are these concepts relevant to       this application?              Thank you very much.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca