From: aminer68@gmail.com   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
      
   Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about entropy and about   
   mathematics and about artificial intelligence and more..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
      
   I think i am smart, and notice carefully what i have just said:   
      
   "I think i am smart, and i say that the way of evolutionary algorithms in   
   artificial intelligence is not the right way since it starts from like the low   
   level layers and it is by logical analogy like circular reasoning, since when   
   you start from like the    
   low level layers like in evolutionary algorithms you need a way to construct a   
   more and more difficult objective function that permit the reward , so it   
   needs more and more smartness so it is like circular reasoning, so i think   
   that the much better way    
   is the way of COMET (short for “commonsense transformers”) that is capable   
   of common sense reasoning, since it is like an emulation that incorporates   
   smartness of humans, so it doesn't start from like the low level layers, so   
   read about it below so    
   that to understand my thoughts and views"   
      
   So i think that it is by logical analogy like the philophical question of:   
      
   Is mathematics discovered or invented ?   
      
      
   So i am really smart, and i will say that there is what we call entropy,   
   so it can be disorder, but mathematics that we discover is not disorder,    
   but it is also not like a sophisticated human language that we talk, so then   
   we can say that mathematics is discovered as not like higher smartness of a   
   sophisticated language that we talk, but it is also invented like a higher   
   smartness sophisticated    
   language that we talk, so then you are understanding my logical analogy with   
   artificial intelligence, that evolutionary algorithms need an    
   objective function that permits the reward, but this objective function    
   needs to be sophisticated like higher smartness of a sophisticated language   
   that we talk to permit general artificial intelligence, so it is like a   
   circular reasoning, since it needs to be organized like a sophisticated   
   smartness and this is not in    
   accordance with the system of natural evolution , since the system of natural   
   evolution that creates human brain was mostly not a sophisticated smartness of   
   the objective function that permit general artificial intelligence.   
      
   More of my philosophy about common sense reasoning and about artificial   
   intelligence and more..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i say that the way of evolutionary algorithms in   
   artificial intelligence is not the right way since it starts from like the low   
   level layers and it is by logical analogy like circular reasoning, since when   
   you start from like the low level layers like in evolutionary algorithms you   
   need a way to    
   construct a more and more difficult objective function that permit the reward   
   , so it needs more and more smartness so it is like circular reasoning, so i   
   think that the much better way is the way of COMET (short for “commonsense   
   transformers”) that    
   is capable of common sense reasoning, since it is like an emulation that   
   incorporates smartness of humans, so it doesn't start from like the low level   
   layers, so read about it below so that to understand my thoughts and   
   views:   
      
   I think i am smart, and i say that in the biologic there is what we call   
   the "useful" for the biological, so the environment is dependent on   
   the genetical diversity, so this being useful in the environment is also the   
   engine that pushes towards better and better quality, so how can   
   you emulate it in artificial intelligence? so how can you emulate water   
   or food that is useful for the biological that permit the apparition of   
   the bigger and bigger brain ? so you are noticing that i am abstracting below   
   by saying in the following that the wanting the useful depends on the   
   environment of the biological that contains the useful:   
      
      
   More of my philosophy about general artificial intelligence and   
   about evolutionary algorithms and more..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i say that there the two ways   
   that permit to construct general artificial intelligence,   
   there is the evolutionary way with evolutionary algorithms and   
   there is like the way that i am talking about it below that   
   is COMET (short for “commonsense transformers”) or the like,   
   i think the evolutionary way like with PSO or neuroevolution   
   algorithms or genetic algorithms is the way that has to maintain   
   "diversity" of the population and it has, and it is the most important thing   
   in artificial intelligence, to create a kind of function that   
   plays the role of the objective function that permits to optimise with a   
   "reward", and by logical analogy, it looks like the requirement   
   to wanting the useful and the wanting of being of higher quality in the   
   natural evolution process that makes the highly better and complex objects   
   such as humans and the human brain, so i think that in artificial intelligence   
   the most difficult part is    
   how to "emulate" this   
   characteristics of the biologic that is genetically equipped with   
   the wanting the useful and wanting to be of or wanting the higher quality, so   
   then you will say that it is part of the diversification process of the   
   evolutionary algorithm, but what i want to explain that the most difficult   
   problem is how to create    
   those kind of characteristics that are biological in artificial intelligence,    
   since the problem is not creating diversity, but it is how to create a kind of   
   diversity that is part of the biologic that permit to be the wanting the   
   useful and wanting to    
   be of or wanting the higher quality, since i say that the requirement of such   
   a difficult objective function that permits   
   the reward is the most difficult part, so i think that abstracting by saying   
   that the evolutionary algorithms need diversification and the   
   the kind of natural selection or objective function is not correct abstraction.   
      
   And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary   
   algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:   
      
   https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0   
      
   And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:   
      
   https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs   
      
   And you can read more about my education and my way of doing here:   
      
   Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)