From: aminer68@gmail.com   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
      
   More of my philosophy about our future world and about COMET (short for   
   “commonsense transformers”) and more..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
      
   I have just read about the artificial intelligence that is called COMET (short   
   for “commonsense transformers”), read about it in my below thoughts, and i   
   am noticing that it is capable of common sense understanding and reasoning, so   
   it will vastly    
   improve our future world, since we will soon be able with COMET (short for   
   “commonsense transformers”) to ask sophisticated questions in a form of   
   our day to day human talks to the web search engine, and the web search engine   
   will be able to much    
   better understand it using common sense understanding of COMET (short for   
   “commonsense transformers”) or the like, so then it will vastly enhance   
   our world, and it will also vastly enhance robotics etc. so it will enhance   
   much more productivity , so    
   then it will higher much more economic growth so that to solve much more   
   efficiently the    
   debt-to-GDP ratio problem and the budget deficit problem of governments. So i   
   think that our future world of year 2030 will be vastly enhanced with   
   artificial intelligence like narrow artificial intelligence and with COMET   
   (short for “commonsense    
   transformers”) etc.   
      
   More of my philosophy about entropy and about mathematics and about artificial   
   intelligence and more..   
      
   I think i am smart, and notice carefully what i have just said:   
      
   "I think i am smart, and i say that the way of evolutionary algorithms in   
   artificial intelligence is not the right way since it starts from like the low   
   level layers and it is by logical analogy like circular reasoning, since when   
   you start from like the    
   low level layers like in evolutionary algorithms you need a way to construct a   
   more and more difficult objective function that permit the reward , so it   
   needs more and more smartness so it is like circular reasoning, so i think   
   that the much better way    
   is the way of COMET (short for “commonsense transformers”) that is capable   
   of common sense reasoning, since it is like an emulation that incorporates   
   smartness of humans, so it doesn't start from like the low level layers, so   
   read about it below so    
   that to understand my thoughts and views"   
      
   So i think that it is by logical analogy like the philosophical question of:   
      
   Is mathematics discovered or invented ?   
      
      
   So i am really smart, and i will say that there is what we call entropy,   
   so it can be disorder, but mathematics that we discover is not disorder,   
   but it is also not like a sophisticated human language that we talk, so then   
   we can say that mathematics is discovered as not like higher smartness of a   
   sophisticated language that we talk, but it is also invented like a higher   
   smartness sophisticated    
   language that we talk, so then you are understanding my logical analogy with   
   artificial intelligence, that evolutionary algorithms need an   
   objective function that permits the reward, but this objective function   
   needs to be sophisticated like higher smartness of a sophisticated language   
   that we talk to permit general artificial intelligence, so it is like a   
   circular reasoning, since it needs to be organized like a sophisticated   
   smartness and this is not in    
   accordance with the system of natural evolution , since the system of natural   
   evolution that creates human brain was mostly not a sophisticated smartness of   
   the objective function that permit general artificial intelligence.   
      
   More of my philosophy about common sense reasoning and about artificial   
   intelligence and more..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i say that the way of evolutionary algorithms in   
   artificial intelligence is not the right way since it starts from like the low   
   level layers and it is by logical analogy like circular reasoning, since when   
   you start from like the low level layers like in evolutionary algorithms you   
   need a way to    
   construct a more and more difficult objective function that permit the reward   
   , so it needs more and more smartness so it is like circular reasoning, so i   
   think that the much better way is the way of COMET (short for “commonsense   
   transformers”) that    
   is capable of common sense reasoning, since it is like an emulation that   
   incorporates smartness of humans, so it doesn't start from like the low level   
   layers, so read about it below so that to understand my thoughts and   
   views:   
      
   I think i am smart, and i say that in the biologic there is what we call   
   the "useful" for the biological, so the environment is dependent on   
   the genetical diversity, so this being useful in the environment is also the   
   engine that pushes towards better and better quality, so how can   
   you emulate it in artificial intelligence? so how can you emulate water   
   or food that is useful for the biological that permit the apparition of   
   the bigger and bigger brain ? so you are noticing that i am abstracting below   
   by saying in the following that the wanting the useful depends on the   
   environment of the biological that contains the useful:   
      
      
   More of my philosophy about general artificial intelligence and   
   about evolutionary algorithms and more..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i say that there the two ways   
   that permit to construct general artificial intelligence,   
   there is the evolutionary way with evolutionary algorithms and   
   there is like the way that i am talking about it below that   
   is COMET (short for “commonsense transformers”) or the like,   
   i think the evolutionary way like with PSO or neuroevolution   
   algorithms or genetic algorithms is the way that has to maintain   
   "diversity" of the population and it has, and it is the most important thing   
   in artificial intelligence, to create a kind of function that   
   plays the role of the objective function that permits to optimise with a   
   "reward", and by logical analogy, it looks like the requirement   
   to wanting the useful and the wanting of being of higher quality in the   
   natural evolution process that makes the highly better and complex objects   
   such as humans and the human brain, so i think that in artificial intelligence   
   the most difficult part is    
   how to "emulate" this   
   characteristics of the biologic that is genetically equipped with   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)