From: aminer68@gmail.com   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
      
   More of my philosophy about societal and individual identity and more of my   
   thoughts..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
      
   I think i am smart, and i think that societal identity can not come    
   from the being rich or having big money, and i think that the societal   
   identity is much more important than individual identity, since it is    
   the very basis for societal order, since the being diversity of this one    
   is rich and that one is not rich or is poor brings a kind of societal disorder   
   and violence, since this kind of being unequal is not liked by people, so this   
   is why i say that it is primordial to compensate it with a kind of being   
   "decency" that maintain    
   order in a society, and this kind of decency is, as i am saying it below, also   
   the fact that we standardize with laws and rules so that to bring order.    
       
   More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and about the laws and   
   more..   
      
   I have to clear something really important about laws, and here is what i will   
   say:   
      
   Western countries have wanted to avoid the radical form, where we have to   
   re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale   
   social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet   
   Republic), since i think    
   this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western   
   countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of expression or   
   speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive rights, since i think   
   that Western countries    
   are proceeding by rational reforms into the society and then to undertake   
   evidence-based assessments, so then they are also monitoring those western   
   rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working   
   correctly , so they can    
   change them, so then from my previous thoughts about nationalism and about the   
   laws you   
   are also understanding the a kind of decency that brings order is so important   
   for the society.   
      
   Read my previous thoughts so that to understand:   
      
   More of my philosophy about nationalism and about the laws and more..   
      
   I think i am smart, since i think that the laws that we enforce and   
   the kind of soft power that we softly enforce like by making them   
   rules that we explain is the constraints that makes the basis of americanism   
   as a nationalism of USA, since speaking and writing english can become a law   
   too if it is necessary, so you will say why not the culture ? but the culture   
   is the expression of    
   the diversity of the population, but the laws and the soft power as soft rules   
   is what "standardize" and makes the the basis of the americanism of USA that i   
   say is the nationalism of USA.   
      
   This is why i also just said the following:   
      
   More of my philosophy of is USA nationalism or patriotism..   
      
   I think that Donald Trump has not brought nationalism to USA, since i think   
   that USA is a kind of nationalism that is not hard nationalism, since USA is a   
   kind of americanism that is a kind of nationalism that is more softer than the   
   one of president    
   Putin, so what is the most important thing in americanism of USA ? i think it   
   is the fact that it also comes from this USA americanism that maintain a kind   
   of order by standardizing by being a mixture of laws that we enforce and by   
   faith in God and a    
   kind of soft power that brings a kind of decency that is an americanism that   
   brings order, so i am saying it like this since   
   the most important part in americanism of USA is how to be an acceptable   
   society by being the right order.   
      
   More of my philosophy about president Putin and about the war in Ukraine..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i think that saying that president Putin is the only   
   one responsable is not correct thinking, and what we have to do   
   is think more efficiently and to try to understand nationalism of president   
   Putin, so we have to ask a question of is nationalism of president Putin too   
   much dictatorial and too much extremist and why is it too much dictatorial and   
   too much extremist,    
   since we can easily notice that the kind of too much dictatorial and extremist   
   nationalism of Putin is not the kind of nationalism of the nationalist Union   
   for a Popular Movement that is centre-right political party in France, so then   
   you are    
   understanding that there is hard and archaic nationalism like in Algeria and   
   Russia and Syria and of the one of Marine Le Pen , and there is more   
   appropriate nationalism like nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is   
   centre-right political party    
   in France, so then you are noticing where is the defect of nationalism of   
   Putin, since i think that nationalism of Putin is partly an archaism that has   
   to be improved by making it look like nationalist Union for a Popular Movement   
   that is centre-right    
   political party in France, but we have to   
   be careful since we have also to take into account the internal context   
   of what has happened in Russia that has created this kind of too much   
   dictatorial and extremist nationalism of president Putin.   
      
   More of my philosophy about human diversity..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i think that one of the most important   
   thing in philosophy is to speak about what is the acceptable human diversity,   
   so i think that what we are trying to do in the societies is that we are also   
   standardizing by using laws, i mean the law doesn't accept all human   
   diversities, and also we have    
   to know that there is   
   soft power and hard power, and the hard power is the laws that we are   
   enforcing, and there is also soft power that we have to use so that   
   to be an acceptable society, this is why i say that having an acceptable   
   society is also knowing how to have smart and wise laws and how to be wisely   
   and proactively a soft power that construct an acceptable society that doesn't   
   degenerate into an unacceptable society. And it is   
   how i am doing it by also inventing many poems of Love and poems so   
   that to be in accordance with my following new proverb, so read them below:   
      
   I think i am really smart, and i am also an inventor of many proverbs,   
   and here is my just new proverb:   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)