Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
| comp.programming | Programming issues that transcend langua | 57,431 messages |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
| Message 55,682 of 57,431 |
| Citizen to All |
| Re: More of my philosophy about societal |
| 26 Apr 22 17:19:33 |
From: ya3891921@gmail.com π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £ £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £ £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £ £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £ π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £ £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £π £ Amine Moulay Ramdane kirjutas PΓΌhapΓ€ev, 17. aprill 2022 kl 09:22:12 UTC+2: > Hello, > > > > More of my philosophy about societal and individual identity and more of my thoughts.. > > I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also > invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. > > > I think i am smart, and i think that societal identity can not come > from the being rich or having big money, and i think that the societal identity is much more important than individual identity, since it is > the very basis for societal order, since the being diversity of this one > is rich and that one is not rich or is poor brings a kind of societal disorder and violence, since this kind of being unequal is not liked by people, so this is why i say that it is primordial to compensate it with a kind of being "decency" that maintain order in a society, and this kind of decency is, as i am saying it below, also the fact that we standardize with laws and rules so that to bring order. > > More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and about the laws and more.. > > I have to clear something really important about laws, and here is what i will say: > > Western countries have wanted to avoid the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational reforms into the society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments, so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they can change them, so then from my previous thoughts about nationalism and about the laws you > are also understanding the a kind of decency that brings order is so important for the society. > > Read my previous thoughts so that to understand: > > More of my philosophy about nationalism and about the laws and more.. > > I think i am smart, since i think that the laws that we enforce and > the kind of soft power that we softly enforce like by making them > rules that we explain is the constraints that makes the basis of americanism as a nationalism of USA, since speaking and writing english can become a law too if it is necessary, so you will say why not the culture ? but the culture is the expression of the diversity of the population, but the laws and the soft power as soft rules is what "standardize" and makes the the basis of the americanism of USA that i say is the nationalism of USA. > > This is why i also just said the following: > > More of my philosophy of is USA nationalism or patriotism.. > > I think that Donald Trump has not brought nationalism to USA, since i think that USA is a kind of nationalism that is not hard nationalism, since USA is a kind of americanism that is a kind of nationalism that is more softer than the one of president Putin, so what is the most important thing in americanism of USA ? i think it is the fact that it also comes from this USA americanism that maintain a kind of order by standardizing by being a mixture of laws that we enforce and by faith in God and a kind of soft power that brings a kind of decency that is an americanism that brings order, so i am saying it like this since > the most important part in americanism of USA is how to be an acceptable > society by being the right order. > > More of my philosophy about president Putin and about the war in Ukraine.. > > I think i am smart, and i think that saying that president Putin is the only one responsable is not correct thinking, and what we have to do > is think more efficiently and to try to understand nationalism of president Putin, so we have to ask a question of is nationalism of president Putin too much dictatorial and too much extremist and why is it too much dictatorial and too much extremist, since we can easily notice that the kind of too much dictatorial and extremist nationalism of Putin is not the kind of nationalism of the nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is centre-right political party in France, so then you are understanding that there is hard and archaic nationalism like in Algeria and Russia and Syria and of the one of Marine Le Pen , and there is more appropriate nationalism like nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is centre-right political party in France, so then you are noticing where is the defect of nationalism of Putin, since i think that nationalism of Putin is partly an archaism that has to be improved by making it look like nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is centre-right political party in France, but we have to > be careful since we have also to take into account the internal context [continued in next message] --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca