Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.programming    |    Programming issues that transcend langua    |    57,431 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 55,836 of 57,431    |
|    Amine Moulay Ramdane to All    |
|    More of my philosophy of is who we are t    |
|    09 May 22 17:07:20    |
      From: aminer68@gmail.com              Hello,                     More of my philosophy of is who we are truly who we are and more of my       thoughts..              I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also       invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..                     If what i have just said, read below, is truth, so i think we can not        be confident about who we truly are, since if the mechanism of telekenisis can       be scaled by the black projects that i have just talked        about, so then even the nature of things can be changed rapidly,        i mean that you can rapidly from the lower level layer makes a human        younger or older and such things, so then you become like a God, so        perhaps we are living with other things, such as secret organizations that       have the power of a God over this earth.              More of my philosophy about the reality and about consciousness and more of my       thoughts..              I think i am highly smart, and how can we understand in a much more       interesting way reality? so if i ask the following mathematical        and philosophical question:              What does tells you the difference between:               4 + 0.0001              and               4 + 0.0002              ?              So now you have to see the pattern with your fluid intelligence,        as i am seeing it:              Since we can say that consciousness is an appreciable change in the       organization of the matter in the brain that makes emerge consciousness, but       we can also say that a small change in the organization of the matter can by       logical analogy makes emerge a        pattern like the one of consciousness, so then we can also say that science is       not able of seeing it, since i think that even telekenisis and remote viewing       with the brain has existed in a really really small number of persons,       and i think that it has been decrypted by some advanced black projects that       have made scientific experiences on those really really small number of       persons that had the ability of remote viewing with the brain and the ability       of telekinesis and i say        that those        advanced black projects have understood those processes and it has made        them advanced so rapidly.               More of my philosophy about consciousness and about science and about       telekinesis and about remote viewing with the brain and more of my thoughts..              I think i am highly smart, so i will say that since science can not       explain consciousness , and since i say that consciousness is       by logical analogy like a pattern that has emerged from the       organization of matter in the brain from genetics, so then       we can say that telekinesis or remote viewing with the brain too can be an       emergence from the organization of the matter of the brain, like       consciousness, that can not be explained by science.              More precision of my philosophy by giving like a logical proof about the       bandwidth of our mind or brain and more of my thoughts..              I think i am highly smart and i have to give more precision with       my logical proof about smartness so that you understand my below thoughts       about the bandwidth of our brain, and here it is:              More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..              I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or       human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively       or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a       value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so       can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is       not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it       is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the       "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human       smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of       human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start       by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain       human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.              Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..              So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that people       can understand, so here it is:              If i say: 2 + 2 = 4              So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints       of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so       mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also       constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and       learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the       same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level of smartness,       so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and       technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on       science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high       human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human       IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human       IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart       you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it       is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making       others not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction and this       is not so efficient.              Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:              Is Science Going To End?              Read more here:              https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End                     More of my philosophy about the bandwidth of our mind or brain and more       of my thoughts..              I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just       spoken about how our brain can work concurrently and not in parallel,              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca