home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.programming      Programming issues that transcend langua      57,431 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 55,836 of 57,431   
   Amine Moulay Ramdane to All   
   More of my philosophy of is who we are t   
   09 May 22 17:07:20   
   
   From: aminer68@gmail.com   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
   More of my philosophy of is who we are truly who we are and more of my   
   thoughts..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
      
   If what i have just said, read below, is truth, so i think we can not    
   be confident about who we truly are, since if the mechanism of telekenisis can   
   be scaled by the black projects that i have just talked    
   about, so then  even the nature of things can be changed rapidly,    
   i mean that you can rapidly from the lower level layer makes a human    
   younger or older and such things, so then you become like a God, so    
   perhaps we are living with other things, such as secret organizations that   
   have the power of a God over this earth.   
      
   More of my philosophy about the reality and about consciousness and more of my   
   thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and how can we understand in a much more   
   interesting way reality? so if i ask the following mathematical    
   and philosophical question:   
      
   What does tells you the difference between:    
      
   4 + 0.0001   
      
   and    
      
   4 + 0.0002   
      
   ?   
      
   So now you have to see the pattern with your fluid intelligence,    
   as i am seeing it:   
      
   Since we can say that consciousness is an appreciable change in the   
   organization of the matter in the brain that makes emerge consciousness, but   
   we can also say that a small change in the organization of the matter can by   
   logical analogy makes emerge a    
   pattern like the one of consciousness, so then we can also say that science is   
   not able of seeing it, since i think that even telekenisis and remote viewing   
   with the brain has existed in a really really small number of persons,   
   and i think that it has been decrypted by some advanced black projects that   
   have made scientific experiences on those really really small number of   
   persons that had the ability of remote viewing with the brain and the ability   
   of telekinesis and i say    
   that those    
   advanced black projects have understood those processes and it has made    
   them advanced so rapidly.     
      
   More of my philosophy about consciousness and about science and about   
   telekinesis and about remote viewing with the brain and more of my thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart, so i will say that since science can not   
   explain consciousness , and since i say that consciousness is   
   by logical analogy like a pattern that has emerged from the   
   organization of matter in the brain from genetics, so then   
   we can say that telekinesis or remote viewing with the brain too can be an   
   emergence from the organization of the matter of the brain, like   
   consciousness, that can not be explained by science.   
      
   More precision of my philosophy by giving like a logical proof about the   
   bandwidth of our mind or brain and more of my thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart and i have to give more precision with   
   my logical proof about smartness so that you understand my below thoughts   
   about the bandwidth of our brain, and here it is:   
      
   More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or   
   human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively   
   or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a   
   value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so   
   can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is   
   not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it   
   is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the   
   "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human   
   smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of   
   human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start   
   by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain   
   human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.   
      
   Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..   
      
   So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that people   
   can understand, so here it is:   
      
   If i say: 2 + 2 = 4   
      
   So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints   
   of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so   
   mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also   
   constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and   
   learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the   
   same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level of smartness,   
   so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and   
   technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on   
   science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high   
   human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human   
   IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human   
   IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart   
   you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it   
   is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making   
   others not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction and this   
   is not so efficient.   
      
   Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:   
      
   Is Science Going To End?   
      
   Read more here:   
      
   https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End   
      
      
   More of my philosophy about the bandwidth of our mind or brain and more   
   of my thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just   
   spoken about how our brain can work concurrently and not in parallel,   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca