From: aminer68@gmail.com   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
      
   Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about is Adam Smith a   
   philosopher or an economist and more of my thoughts..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i say that when you understand much more deeply   
   Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, you will notice that he is much   
   more a philosopher than an economist, since i am noticing rapidly his kind of   
   philosophy, since    
   as i am explaining in my below thoughts, he is showing how individual egoism   
   gives rise or creates societal or group egoism and how both individual egoism   
   and societal egoism or group egoism give rise or creates competition and how   
   competition regulates    
   the economic activity, and how competition    
   is based on profit, and how competition must be smart by attracting with a big   
   profit so that to favor growth, and favor a good allocation of resources and,   
   ultimately, innovation, and of course his model   
   also speaks about how Adam Smith argued that profits flowed from capital   
   investments, and that capital gets directed to where the most profit can be   
   made, and i think that as competition , this idea is central to capitalism,   
   since i think that it also    
   favors growth and favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately,   
   innovation, and it looks like the why we have to be financial capitalism too,   
   since i say about it the following:   
      
   The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people, in the   
   sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to start a   
   company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In a world where   
   finance works well, the    
   people with talent can actually start firms and reach their dreams without   
   waiting to either have saved the money, or be lucky and receive it from their   
   parents, and once you create this opportunity, you will have the most talented   
   people take advantage    
   of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a good allocation of   
   resources and, ultimately, innovation.   
      
   And of course i say that we have not to be pessimistic, since we have always   
   to take into account the very important fact that capitalism is not a zero sum   
   game, since with a "reasonable" level of growth, capitalism can both deliver   
   rising living    
   standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the   
   owners of capital.   
      
      
   Read my previous thoughts:   
      
   More of my philosophy about more of my views about Adam Smith model and more   
   of my thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i say that you have to understand more deeply   
   Adam Smith model, i mean that it is a generality and it comes   
   with conditionalities such as a "good competition" means also that   
   a local zone like the European union or local region such as a country   
   have to have a good diversification of the economy so that to be a resilient   
   economy that works correctly, so as you notice that Adam Smith is not speaking   
   about the being good diversification of the economy,   
   since his model, as i am explaining it, is an abstract generalization,   
   also it is also an abstract generalization when competition means the   
   existence of a good competition as different economic competitors that compete   
   and that offer the good choices of products and services.   
      
   More of my philosophy about the model of Adam Smith and more of my thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i think that Adam Smith is really   
   highly smart too, since in my logical proof below of how to understand   
   the following saying of Adam Smith:   
      
   "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"   
      
   We can say that when we say a "good competition" , it also means a good   
   diversification of the economy that makes the economy resilient,   
   so then this makes the Adam Smith model from the above saying correct, so then   
   here is the rest of my logical proof that explains the above saying:   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i think what he means is that it is from   
   individual human egoism or self-interest that comes solidarity and cooperation   
   and collaboration, as i am explaining in my thoughts below, and it can become   
   an egoism as a group of    
   solidarity or/and cooperation or/and collaboration against the other group,   
   but it can also become a universal solidarity and/or cooperation and/or   
   collaboration, so then this egoism as an individual or as a group creates   
   competition, and competition    
   does regulate economic activity, so then i say that it is the model of Adam   
   Smith, and as you notice that in the model of Adam Smith, egoism is the engine   
   and the cause of properity and happiness of nations.   
      
   Read my previous thoughts:   
      
      
   More precision of my philosophy about the Adam Smith idea about competition is   
   the regulator of economic activity and more of my thoughts..   
      
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i am quickly understanding Adam Smith   
   architectural idea of: competition regulates the economic activity,   
   since i think that his model speaks about competition in a global world,   
   so he is like proving in a general way, but the world is not organized   
   in such a way, since the world is organized in zones like European union   
   or like countries, so when Adam Smith says that competition is the regulator   
   of economic activity , he also means that competition has to exist as a first   
   condition, so if competition exists , he then says   
   that competition can be the regulator of economic activity, but i think   
   that it is not true, since there is still a missing part, since what i have   
   just said that competition is not sufficient, since we have   
   to have a good "diversification" of the economy that makes the economy   
   "resilient".   
      
   More of my philosophy about the holistic view of competition and more   
   of my thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and so that to understand my thoughts below   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)